![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the middle of Mc Entire class D airspace, Shaw approach gave me "radar
services terminated, squawk VFR, for further flight following suggest you contact Columbia approach on 133.4". Hmmmm.... Doesn't this mean that the instant after he terminated me, that I was not in two-way communication with the ATC facility (and unintentionally in violation Most likely he had already given a call to the class D tower and coordinated your transition as he would with IFR traffic. of 91.129(c)(1))? If so, what action should I have taken? Honestly, He didn't say he won't accept any further radio calls from you, did he? Did he say "freq change approved"? Anyway, the action is quite obvious - you should have called him again with a request for clarification, because you didn't fully understand his intentions (smth like "please confirm we do not need to call the ... tower"). "When in doubt, ask" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arden Prinz" wrote in message m... Perhaps, but I'm not sure how that impacts my requirement to have/maintain two way communication. You were relieved of the requirements of FAR 91.129(c)(1) in accordance with FAR 91.129(a). § 91.129 Operations in Class D airspace. (a) General. Unless otherwise authorized or required by the ATC facility having jurisdiction over the Class D airspace area, each person operating an aircraft in Class D airspace must comply with the applicable provisions of this section. In addition, each person must comply with §§ 91.126 and 91.127. For the purpose of this section, the primary airport is the airport for which the Class D airspace area is designated. A satellite airport is any other airport within the Class D airspace area. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Vassilii Khachaturov" wrote in message om... Most likely he had already given a call to the class D tower and coordinated your transition as he would with IFR traffic. Remember, this is not an arrival, but a through flight. Would it be likely for through IFR traffic to be that low that the controller would normally provide such coordination for a through IFR flight. I'm thinking that would be quite unusual. "When in doubt, ask" Agree 100%. -- Bob PP-ASEL-IA, A/IGI |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Henry" wrote in message news:bihYa.26631$5f.4102@lakeread05... Remember, this is not an arrival, but a through flight. Would it be likely for through IFR traffic to be that low that the controller would normally provide such coordination for a through IFR flight. I'm thinking that would be quite unusual. The lowest practical enroute IFR altitude tends to be the MIA/MVA plus 1000 feet rounded up to the next cardinal altitude. That tends to be more than 2500 AGL and thus above typical Class D airspace. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Keith Willshaw... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 253 | July 6th 04 05:18 AM |
Night of the bombers - the most daring special mission of Finnishbombers in WW2 | Jukka O. Kauppinen | Military Aviation | 4 | March 22nd 04 11:19 PM |
Which post-WW2 combat aircraft have not been used in combat? | Kirk Stant | Military Aviation | 96 | December 10th 03 03:03 PM |
Hispanic Hero Recalls Experiences | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 30th 03 10:02 PM |
#1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 03:04 AM |