![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maule Driver wrote:
Interesting question. Without trying to look it up, I would say that it is your responsibility to remain clear or make contact with Mc Entire Tower when VFR. Maule Driver, This was the subject of a long thread some time ago. The bottom line is: It is NOT the responsibility of a pilot receiving radar services to coordinate with each surface area he flies through. (if he is landing in that surface area, ordinarily radar services would be terminated prior to entering it) The facility providing the radar services is supposed to coordinate, and maintaining contact with them counts under the communication requirement of the FARS. I have heard before that there are some areas where this does not happen, but it is spelled out quite clearly in the controller's regulations (7110.65) it is supposed to. The particular situation described is problematic, because the facility providing radar services terminated them w/out a handoff. In that circumstance, I personally would probably contact the tower immediately, including in my call up something like "I had radar services from XXXX, I assume they coordinated with you". (because that's what's supposed to happen). Cheers, sydney |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Sydney Hoeltzli" wrote in message
... Maule Driver wrote: Interesting question. Without trying to look it up, I would say that it is your responsibility to remain clear or make contact with Mc Entire Tower when VFR. The bottom line is: It is NOT the responsibility of a pilot receiving radar services to coordinate with each surface area he flies through. (if he is landing in that surface area, ordinarily radar services would be terminated prior to entering it) The facility providing the radar services is supposed to coordinate, and maintaining contact with them counts under the communication requirement of the FARS. Makes sense and I stand corrected. Thanks. I was trying to think through the meaning of 'radar services' and 'flight following'. I was thinking that you are not bound to maintain a heading or an altitude while under FF (right?). So that would mean that you can deviate from your reported heading and altitude and enter Class D without necessarily notifying the controller. Or am I way off base here and need to do some reading? The particular situation described is problematic, because the facility providing radar services terminated them w/out a handoff. In that circumstance, I personally would probably contact the tower immediately, including in my call up something like "I had radar services from XXXX, I assume they coordinated with you". (because that's what's supposed to happen). Really puts the focus on situational awareness when that happens! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maule Driver wrote:
I was trying to think through the meaning of 'radar services' and 'flight following'. I was thinking that you are not bound to maintain a heading or an altitude while under FF (right?). So that would mean that you can deviate from your reported heading and altitude and enter Class D without necessarily notifying the controller. Sure, you can change heading and altitude without necessarily notifying the controller, but situational awareness and common sense do enter into it. The radar controller will make a decision on whether or not he needs to coordinate based on your altitude and direction of flight. If you need to change either or both, and that change might put you in a surface area your original altitude and heading would keep you clear of, it may not be a regulatory requirement to communicate your intentions but it only makes sense IMO. The particular situation described is problematic, because the facility providing radar services terminated them w/out a handoff. In that circumstance, I personally would probably contact the tower immediately, including in my call up something like "I had radar services from XXXX, I assume they coordinated with you". (because that's what's supposed to happen). Really puts the focus on situational awareness when that happens! Well, Steve may be correct that the communication requirements have been met, but I'd personally contact the tower in those circs, just in case there was a need to communicate; IME it takes several minutes to establish communication and radar contact with a busy approach facility, and I really don't want to be distracted from keeping a sharp look-out when I'm close to an airport, either. Cheers, Sydney |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Keith Willshaw... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 253 | July 6th 04 05:18 AM |
Night of the bombers - the most daring special mission of Finnishbombers in WW2 | Jukka O. Kauppinen | Military Aviation | 4 | March 22nd 04 11:19 PM |
Which post-WW2 combat aircraft have not been used in combat? | Kirk Stant | Military Aviation | 96 | December 10th 03 03:03 PM |
Hispanic Hero Recalls Experiences | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 30th 03 10:02 PM |
#1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 03:04 AM |