![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Koenig wrote
Unless you hold an instructor or ATP certificate, you can only log PIC time for the period during which you are the sole manipulator of the controls. Robert Not true... if more than one pilot is required (pilot and safety Robert pilot) either one may be the PIC and log PIC. Hmmm... other posters differ from you on that. In what respect do they differ? If it is my airplane and I am the pilot flying with a hood on, I tell the safety pilot that I am the PIC and I log PIC on two accounts. First I am the sole manipulator of the controls and second because I AM the PIC. He logs SIC. Second case, I am the pilot flying and I tell the safety pilot that he is the PIC for the flight. I log PIC since I am the sole manipulator of the controls AND he logs PIC because he really is the PIC. See my original statement. I think you're right -- you need separate endorsements for each kind of high-performance airplane. Robert Not true, an endorsement in a Cessna 210 is good for a Bonanza. That's because a Cessna 210 is both kinds at once, so if you're endorsed for a 210, you effectively have both endorsements. On the other hand, if you're endorsed for a Cessna 177RG, I don't think that endorsement is valid for a 182. You are confusing "High Performance" and "Complex". The C-182 is both complex and high performance. The C-177RG is only complex. A "complex" endorsement is good for all complex airplanes, a "high performance" endorsement is good for all types of high performance airplanes. Bob Moore ATP CFII |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 22:41:21 GMT, Robert Moore wrote:
You are confusing "High Performance" and "Complex". The C-182 is both complex and high performance. The C-177RG is only complex. Surely you mean the C-182RG is both complex & high perf. The C-182 is only "high performance". The C-177RG is, of course, "complex" but not "high performance". A "complex" endorsement is good for all complex airplanes, a "high performance" endorsement is good for all types of high performance airplanes. True. Morris |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(journeyman) wrote
Surely you mean the C-182RG is both complex & high perf. The C-182 is only "high performance". The C-177RG is, of course, "complex" but not "high performance". Yep! A slip of the fingers. :-) Bob Moore |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 3 | June 23rd 04 04:05 PM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
AF investigators cite pilot error in fighter crash | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 9th 04 09:55 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |