![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Casey Wilson wrote:
Quote all the 'documents' you want -- my real-life experience proves to me that NiMH are by far superior to alkaline batteries. That's like saying aluminum is far superior to steel. In reality it depends on the situation. Expensive, yes. Worth it, you bet! They're what will go in my handheld and I'm willing to trust my family's safety to them. I'm not trying to say NiMH are worthless. In fact in the situations you describe they are an excellent choice. However for something that is only used briefly at very rare intervals, such as a hand held Tx that is carried for the sole purpose of back up for when the panel radio dies, non rechargeable batteries are the way to go. Stick them in the radio today, and 18 months from now when I need it, I can be confident that they are still going to work. As a side note; when it comes to rechargeable batteries, I don't know why every one dismisses NiCd's so quickly. In many applications I think they are arguably as well suited as NiMH. They are cheaper, have a greater number of cycles before they die, and the memory effect which is no longer as bad as some would have you believe, is rather easily managed with the right charger and by using 2 battery packs. -- Chris Woodhouse Oklahoma City "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris W" wrote in message ... Casey Wilson wrote: Quote all the 'documents' you want -- my real-life experience proves to me that NiMH are by far superior to alkaline batteries. That's like saying aluminum is far superior to steel. In reality it depends on the situation. No, your metaphor doesn't work. We are talking about batteries. I'm not trying to say NiMH are worthless. In fact in the situations you describe they are an excellent choice. However for something that is only used briefly at very rare intervals, such as a hand held Tx that is carried for the sole purpose of back up for when the panel radio dies, non rechargeable batteries are the way to go. Stick them in the radio today, and 18 months from now when I need it, I can be confident that they are still going to work. I think part of the trip planning check list should include checking the spare (read emergency) radio. Particularly if it is an item you might want to depend on in a critical situation. Stashing it somewhere for months doesn't seem like a safe idea. I plan on using mine every time I go flying. Like, listening to ATIS or calling ground before cranking the engine. Seems to me that would save some time on the Hobbs. As a side note; when it comes to rechargeable batteries, I don't know why every one dismisses NiCd's so quickly. In many applications I think they are arguably as well suited as NiMH. They are cheaper, have a greater number of cycles before they die, and the memory effect which is no longer as bad as some would have you believe, is rather easily managed with the right charger and by using 2 battery packs. My post was aimed at alkaline batteries. But since you mentioned them, my personal experience with NiMH versus NiCad is pretty much the same. NiCad batteries have not lived up to the heavy power drain of my camera. I don't expect them to work any differently in a handheld Xceiver. I used to use NiCad in my RC equipment. Same thing. Memory effect aside, NiCads just have not performed as well as NiMH. Also, I've tossed a lot of NiCad batteries that went kaput before NiMH went on the market. I'm still using every NiMH I've ever bought. No, I take that back.... a thief stole a camera bag along with eight batteries last month. I did replace those. Maybe my experience is enigmatic. Do what feels good for you. I don't condemn you or NiCads. Regards, Casey |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Casey Wilson wrote:
"Chris W" wrote in message That's like saying aluminum is far superior to steel. In reality it depends on the situation. No, your metaphor doesn't work. We are talking about batteries. I think my analogy is just fine. There are times when aluminum fits the application best and times when steel is a better choice. With batteries there are times when rechargeable are handy to use and times when non rechargeable are a better choice. I don't see how you can disagree with that when you consider this situation? The battery in my watch went for almost 4 years before I had to change it, would you use a rechargeable in that watch if you could? Of course not, it would discharge its self faster than the watch discharged it. There is room to disagree on where the line of when to use rechargeables vs non rechargeables is, but the line does exist. I think part of the trip planning check list should include checking the spare (read emergency) radio. Particularly if it is an item you might want to depend on in a critical situation. If I was going on a long XC I probably would do that, but for short flights of an hour or so I doubt many people would go to the bother, I wouldn't. Stashing it somewhere for months doesn't seem like a safe idea. I plan on using mine every time I go flying. Like, listening to ATIS or calling ground before cranking the engine. Seems to me that would save some time on the Hobbs. From the perspective of flying my own home built, I wouldn't be doing that. However if you do and the battery life of alkaline is short enough that you need to replace them every 2 or 3 trips then I can see using rechargeables. I don't know how long they would last in that situation, I would check first. My post was aimed at alkaline batteries. But since you mentioned them, my personal experience with NiMH versus NiCad is pretty much the same. NiCad batteries have not lived up to the heavy power drain of my camera. I don't expect them to work any differently in a handheld Xceiver. I used to use NiCad in my RC equipment. Same thing. Memory effect aside, NiCads just have not performed as well as NiMH. Also, I've tossed a lot of NiCad batteries that went kaput before NiMH went on the market. I'm still using every NiMH I've ever bought. No, I take that back.... a thief stole a camera bag along with eight batteries last month. I did replace those. Maybe my experience is enigmatic. Do what feels good for you. I don't condemn you or NiCads. I've never had any problems with NiCd when I was doing RC, One thing that is a problem is using a battery pack with enough capacity. Generally a pack with twice the capacity will last a lot more than twice as long because the current drain is a lower percentage of the batteries ratting. Since NiMH batteries normally have more capacity than a NiCd of the same size that may be why the NiMH were working so much better for you. If you could use a larger NiCd battery I think you would find they work about as well as the NiMH. I think that designers of electronic equipment, in an effort to design as small as possible, often use a battery that is too small for the load requirements, in a case like that if you put NiMH batteries than generally have the higher capacity for the same size battery you are going to see a big improvement because the NiMH is sized more appropriately for the load. I am having that exact problem with a cordless phone right now. It comes with a 850 mAh NiCd and it goes dead every time you turn around. If you replace it with the alternate 1200 mAh NiMH the battery life is very good. If I could fit a 1200 mAh NiCd in the phone I am sure it would do just fine as long as the memory problem was managed. -- Chris Woodhouse Oklahoma City "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think my analogy is just fine.
I think the real question here is this: Why does Casey put up with owning a camera that uses an entire set of alkaline batteries to take just ten pictures?! :-) But seriously, thanks for the answers guys. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the real question here is this: Why does Casey put up with owning
a camera that uses an entire set of alkaline batteries to take just ten pictures?! :-) My wife thinks the shoulder strap is really cool. Casey |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|