![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Capt. Doug" wrote in message ...
Chip Jones wrote in message The response I get is "Baron 123 is IMC, no contact." While your scenario may be right on the money, let me point out that some pilots will claim to be IMC even when there isn't a cloud in the sky. Their reasoning is that by doing this, it keep the onus of seperation on the controller. Hi Doug, There's also the vis. factor. If it's hazy and you're flying towards the sun, you can't see a durn thing even if there isn't a cloud out there. You're flying on instruments; isn't that properly described as "IMC" with no funky legal reasoning behind it? OTOH, a plane flying perp. or away from the sun can legitimately see 3+ miles IIRC the Baron was flying 110, early a.m., perhaps this is possible? Cheers, Sydney |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Snowbird wrote in message There's also the vis. factor. If it's hazy and
you're flying towards the sun, you can't see a durn thing even if there isn't a cloud out there. OTOH, a plane flying perp. or away from the sun can legitimately see 3+ miles Last weekend, I flew up to North Carolina at 16,500'. I try to put one of the local flight instructors in the seat when I can. It was a hazy summer day, but the co-pilot of the day had no problem maintaining straight and level, staying out of the clouds, and spotting landmarks. However, the TCAD (traffic collision avoidance thing) would show an occassional target being within 3 miles of us and we couldn't see them for nothing. D. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, my old TCADs used to do that for me in eastern Kansas, too.
(Or maybe it was in western Missouri, I'm not too sure.) I've not noticed it since I upgraded to a 9900BX last year, though. ---JRC--- "Capt. Doug" wrote in message = ... =20 However, the TCAD (traffic collision avoidance thing) would show an occassional target = being within 3 miles of us and we couldn't see them for nothing. =20 D. =20 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John R. Copeland" wrote in
: Yes, my old TCADs used to do that for me in eastern Kansas, too. (Or maybe it was in western Missouri, I'm not too sure.) I've not noticed it since I upgraded to a 9900BX last year, though. ---JRC--- We're getting a few aircraft with the Goodyear system, & I love it. I see aircraft flying out over the Gulf that I would never see at all if I didn't see them come up on there. But we sometimes still can't see them, even on a clear day. It depends a lot on the paint scheme and the position of the sun. A white and blue helicopter over water is very difficult to see. -- Regards, Stan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stan Gosnell" wrote in message ... We're getting a few aircraft with the Goodyear system, & I love it. BFG = Goodrich. Wrong tire company. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
Riddle me this, pilots | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 137 | August 30th 03 04:02 AM |