![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Lowrey" wrote in message om... Pete Zaitcev wrote in message ... "Lag" in the original poster's case, is actually referred to as "latency" in the world of computer networking. Latency is defined as the time it takes to set up and send a message, Well, it's the overall transmission time from source to destination. The overhead to set up and send a satellite packet isn't really any worse than anything else, it just takes a long time to deliever. Since all data is transported in TCP packets (in the case of Web traffic), there is continual send AND receive on BOTH sides since TCP requires acknowledgement of every packet on the part the of the receiver (remember, TCP is a *reliable* protocol). Actually, it's acknowledgement of the position in the byte stream. Granted, the ACK packets are much smaller than the data packets There's no such thing as an ACK packet. A TCP packet can have data as well as the ack for data received. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ron Natalie" wrote:
There's no such thing as an ACK packet. A TCP packet can have data as well as the ack for data received. I wouldn't say there's "no such thing". The people I work with generally call a packet with the ACK bit set an "ACK". :-). And if you examine the packets flying in and out during a web surfing session, they usually don't contain any data. The latency in the network is going to affect the retransmission timer on the sending end. Delay is delay. It's not constant, but it is cumulative. I'll concede, though, that as long as the acknowledgement timing is not highly variable, the window will stabilize and you'll get your nominal throughput *for that particular HTTP request*. Another click or a redirect and, presto, another delay. It all adds up. Sorry to flog the dead horse... I'll shut up. -Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FBO's and WiFi | Javier Henderson | General Aviation | 43 | August 30th 03 08:22 AM |