A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

767 at LAX did a go-around today!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 21st 03, 05:02 AM
Jeff Franks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yep. Friend of mine is a AA pilot and told me that they had to land once
without flaps. Trouble was that none of them knew what the speeds were for
that setup, so they had to dig out the books ("professional" pilots mind
you). They were a bit close, so they went around and announced that another
plane had come out on the runway.

Kinda irked me because it gives the non-flying public the impression that
ATC/GA/Another pilot had put them at risk, when this was not the case. Why
lie? Just tell the passengers whats happening and get on with it.


  #2  
Old August 21st 03, 05:20 AM
Yossarian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Come on, that's easy. Most people will be freaked out enough that they
aren't landing on the first try, without having to believe it's a problem
with their own plane.

"Jeff Franks" wrote in message
...
Yep. Friend of mine is a AA pilot and told me that they had to land once
without flaps. Trouble was that none of them knew what the speeds were

for
that setup, so they had to dig out the books ("professional" pilots mind
you). They were a bit close, so they went around and announced that

another
plane had come out on the runway.

Kinda irked me because it gives the non-flying public the impression that
ATC/GA/Another pilot had put them at risk, when this was not the case.

Why
lie? Just tell the passengers whats happening and get on with it.




  #3  
Old August 21st 03, 05:30 AM
Jeff Franks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bull. Don't lie to me. Even if I know nothing about whats going on.
Explain it to me in a way that I'll understand that "hey this isn't a big
deal, we'll just land on a longer runway while going a little faster than
normal". I'd rather see that than to be told that the whole friggen system
is at fault and some "small plane" (that was the term they used) had just
screwed up. Not for me.


"Yossarian" wrote in message
et...
Come on, that's easy. Most people will be freaked out enough that they
aren't landing on the first try, without having to believe it's a problem
with their own plane.

"Jeff Franks" wrote in message
...
Yep. Friend of mine is a AA pilot and told me that they had to land

once
without flaps. Trouble was that none of them knew what the speeds were

for
that setup, so they had to dig out the books ("professional" pilots mind
you). They were a bit close, so they went around and announced that

another
plane had come out on the runway.

Kinda irked me because it gives the non-flying public the impression

that
ATC/GA/Another pilot had put them at risk, when this was not the case.

Why
lie? Just tell the passengers whats happening and get on with it.






  #4  
Old August 21st 03, 05:31 AM
John Harlow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yep. Friend of mine is a AA pilot and told me that they had to land once
without flaps. Trouble was that none of them knew what the speeds were

for
that setup, so they had to dig out the books ("professional" pilots mind
you). They were a bit close, so they went around and announced that

another
plane had come out on the runway.

Kinda irked me because it gives the non-flying public the impression that
ATC/GA/Another pilot had put them at risk, when this was not the case.

Why
lie? Just tell the passengers whats happening and get on with it.


I wonder what compels them to get on the horn and say something about it in
the first place. Just fly the damn plane.


  #5  
Old August 21st 03, 05:55 AM
John Gaquin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jeff Franks" wrote in message

....Trouble was that none of them knew what the speeds were for
that setup, so they had to dig out the books ("professional" pilots mind
you).


That's normal. That's the safest way to do it. There's no point in
committing details of abnormal procedures to memory -- plenty of time to
look them up. And you don't "..dig out the books..". There are convenient
checklists all prepared that cover virtually all eventualities. There are a
few emergency procedures that you do memorize -- immediate action items
only.

Regards,

John Gaquin
B727, B747


  #6  
Old August 21st 03, 06:00 AM
John Gaquin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jeff Franks" wrote in message

Kinda irked me because it gives the non-flying public the impression that
ATC/GA/Another pilot had put them at risk, when this was not the case.

Why
lie? Just tell the passengers whats happening and get on with it.


It's a careful balancing act. Some people watch the progress of the flight
out the window, and have some familiarity. But not many. Most people
haven't got a clue what makes an airplane tick, and if you tell them
somethings not absolutely 100% normal, they'll get upset. You could wind up
causing more problems than you already have. Generally speaking, if you're
dealing with an abnormal, glossing over it is acceptable -- it really is no
big deal. If you have a bona fide emergency, you play straight and right up
front.

--
Regards,

John Gaquin
B727, B747


  #7  
Old August 21st 03, 01:12 PM
Mike Beede
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Jeff Franks wrote:

Friend of mine is a AA pilot and told me that they had to land once
without flaps. Trouble was that none of them knew what the speeds were for
that setup, so they had to dig out the books ("professional" pilots mind
you).


I'd be willing to bet that the landing speeds vary over a wide range
depending on gross weight of the aircraft. They probably have to
check a table every time they take off or land to see what the reference
speed is. I think if your "friend" is reading the thread, you owe him
an "apology."

Regards,

Mike Beede
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I'M GOING TO DIE TODAY. ArtKramr Military Aviation 0 February 4th 04 09:44 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt" WWII Double Feature at Zeno'sDrive-In Zeno Aerobatics 0 August 2nd 03 07:31 PM
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt": An Awesome WWII DoubleFeature at Zeno's Drive-In zeno Piloting 0 July 14th 03 07:31 PM
The Yankee Lady Flew Today Tom Huxton Piloting 0 July 11th 03 11:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.