![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Duniho wrote: As far as I know, the language used in the controller's handbook allows altitude changes any time a controller is supposed to vector an airplane. It would be a significant change, and would add even more complexity to the handbook, to call out this particular case as a situation where the controller is permitted to providing heading guidance but not altitude. A controller owns a chunk of airspace. As long as I meet the separation standards I can do whatever I need to with you. The main reason that TCAS doesn't cause accidents today is that it's used in a way that is unlikely to cause accidents. Airplanes that are in IMC are being positively controlled by ATC, and the TCAS should only provide a warning when ATC has made an egregious error. That doesn't happen very often. Furthermore, the airplanes involved are both under radar control, so even though the TCAS doesn't know it, the Mode C *has* been verified. Airplanes that are in VMC, whether under positive control by ATC or not, have the ability to use the TCAS to help them *spot traffic*, rather than just blindly trust the TCAS to tell them what to do. The pilots can then make a course adjustment as appropriate, based on *what they see*. TCAS is most useful in class D type tower situations. These are where you are most likely to have the spam cans flying around with unverified mode C. If the TCAS gives an RA the airliner must take the action suggested. Places like Orange County and Pontiac come to mind. Lots and lots of VFR targets |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Newps" wrote in message news:cI91b.218085$Ho3.28456@sccrnsc03... A controller owns a chunk of airspace. As long as I meet the separation standards I can do whatever I need to with you. The controller can do only what is consistent with FAAO 7110.65. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
If the TCAS gives an RA the airliner must take the action suggested. Do TCAS RA's take terrain into account? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Roy Smith wrote: If the TCAS gives an RA the airliner must take the action suggested. Do TCAS RA's take terrain into account? TCAS units do not contain terrain databases. -- Bob Noel |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Roy Smith wrote: Newps wrote: If the TCAS gives an RA the airliner must take the action suggested. Do TCAS RA's take terrain into account? Yes, the airplane knows how high it is. It will not drive it self into the ground. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote in message news:dTf1b.167931$cF.58574@rwcrnsc53...
Roy Smith wrote: Newps wrote: If the TCAS gives an RA the airliner must take the action suggested. Do TCAS RA's take terrain into account? Yes, the airplane knows how high it is. It will not drive it self into the ground. Knowing how high it is, is only part of what's needed -- does it know where it is, and how high the terrain is nearby? Cheers, Sydney |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Snowbird wrote: Newps wrote in message news:dTf1b.167931$cF.58574@rwcrnsc53... Roy Smith wrote: Newps wrote: If the TCAS gives an RA the airliner must take the action suggested. Do TCAS RA's take terrain into account? Yes, the airplane knows how high it is. It will not drive it self into the ground. Knowing how high it is, is only part of what's needed -- does it know where it is, and how high the terrain is nearby? Doesn't need to know where it is. Only how far above the ground it is or will be in a few seconds. The TCAS will only tell you to go either up or down, not right or left. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
Riddle me this, pilots | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 137 | August 30th 03 04:02 AM |