A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Overly restrictive business flying requirements.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 22nd 03, 10:45 PM
John Galban
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message v.net...

The more cowardly BS I see from these companies, the more I realize that I
will only ever be happy with my own company.


And when you do own your own company, will you happily accept the
liability for your employees to fly their own planes on company
business? One accident could wipe you out.

I don't know if I'd call these companies "cowardly". In today's
legal environment, they're merely covering their butts. I can
certainly understand why.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)
  #2  
Old August 22nd 03, 11:50 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Galban" wrote:
And when you do own your own company, will you happily accept the
liability for your employees to fly their own planes on company
business? One accident could wipe you out.


One auto accident could wipe me out, too. It is something I take very
seriously; I have fired an otherwise good employee for driving
infractions. But your question is valid. If one of my employees became
a pilot, I believe I would permit him to fly on business. The only
restriction I can think of off-hand: no passengers.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM


  #3  
Old August 23rd 03, 12:30 AM
Peter Gottlieb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Galban" wrote in message
om...
"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message

v.net...

The more cowardly BS I see from these companies, the more I realize that

I
will only ever be happy with my own company.


And when you do own your own company, will you happily accept the
liability for your employees to fly their own planes on company
business? One accident could wipe you out.


I can also get killed crossing the street. Actually I do own my own company
and I let my people travel any way they choose.

I don't know if I'd call these companies "cowardly". In today's
legal environment, they're merely covering their butts. I can
certainly understand why.


I can understand why also, it's just that I don't bow to such restrictions.


  #4  
Old August 24th 03, 01:19 AM
John Galban
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message v.net...
"John Galban" wrote in message
om...
"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message

v.net...

The more cowardly BS I see from these companies, the more I realize that

I
will only ever be happy with my own company.


And when you do own your own company, will you happily accept the
liability for your employees to fly their own planes on company
business? One accident could wipe you out.


I can also get killed crossing the street. Actually I do own my own company
and I let my people travel any way they choose.


Are your "people" directly employed by your company and is the
business travel directly related to the business (not to-from work)?
I can't believe you'd have no restrictions whatsoever, as you imply
above. If an employee is a low-time VFR PPL you wouldn't mind if he
headed of to a job site in a complex single in marginal weather?
Granted, that's an extreme example, but it's the reason that most
companies have risk-management departments that issue draconian
restrictions. Given the current litigious climate (particularly in
aviation matters), you have to see a substantial benefit to private
flying on company business to justify the risk.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)
  #5  
Old August 25th 03, 12:56 AM
David Lesher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Dave Touretzky did a lot of work on his employer, a large university.

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/usr/dst/public/flying/ga-travel-policy.txt


--
A host is a host from coast to
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Routine Aviation Career Guy Alcala Military Aviation 0 September 26th 04 12:33 AM
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post MrHabilis Home Built 0 June 11th 04 05:07 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM
Progress on Flying Car Steve Dufour General Aviation 5 December 19th 03 03:48 PM
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING The Ink Company Aviation Marketplace 0 November 5th 03 12:07 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.