![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ron McKinnon" wrote in message
. ca... "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message ... On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:08:31 -0400, Ray Andraka wrote: I also saw the article on avweb this morning. Being a Rhode Island based pilot, I am deeply troubled by this. I have spent a bit of time today trying to find the legislation that enacts this, and so far have not found it. If you have a bill or resolution number, I could use that when I call my rep to bitch about it. We did have a bill in the legislature to repeal sales and use taxes on aircraft related matters here in the state to help encourage business. This news is diametrically opposed to what had been proposed in the bill earlier this year. http://www.rules.state.ri.us/rules/r...DOTAX_2510.pdf Interesting. This document raises a number of questions in my mind, such as: This document specifies the effective date as April 02, 2003. Has this been in force since then? If so, why are we just aware of it now?, and if not, can the state impose a new tax retroactively? (It would seem to be unconstitutional, US Constitution, article 9 ..."No bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed.") I'm also thinking that charging the tax on aircraft relocated to RI, from some other state, is effectively a 'tax or duty laid on articles exported from another state', which would also seem to be denied by the US Constitution (article 9, also). What is the 'emergency' justification? Is this justification within the purview of Tax Administrator? What legal/public process is required in order to cause such a regulation to come into effect? Did this occur? Can a new tax be imposed without legislative or public input? What kind of notice period is required for such a new tax? Or is that the 'emergency' - an end-run around the nuisance of a public process? Oops. References here to 'article 9' should have been article 1, section 9 .... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aviation Ebay Madness... | Richard Stewart | Military Aviation | 17 | February 9th 04 10:17 AM |
It's over was: RI tax madness | Roger Long | Owning | 18 | September 3rd 03 10:03 PM |
RI tax madness | Peter Gottlieb | Owning | 9 | August 29th 03 04:06 PM |