![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... [snipped] Yes, but without a powerful public employees union to block improvements. (ie RIF) Now that's a scream, John! Do you remember August of 1981? A pleasant little group of unselfish, altruistic Americans who called themselves PATCO? Think they're gone from the ATC scene? Think again. Who do you think represents all of those private *contract* towers these days? Not NATCA. Yep, PATCO, the one and only. The ones who said "America can't fire us all..." Big labor is into ATC no matter whether public or private, it just depends on which flavor of labor you prefer. You see, PATCO wants to see privatization too- it's right up their alley (more little bargaining units to represent...) Personally, I think NATCA has a much better track record of public service than PATCO, but it's your call, bro. I'd be happy to post a link to the PATCO site if you want to read about what a great job private ATC providers do with all that federal contract money they receive from FAA. Chip, ZTL |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|