![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() But think for a second - why do you suppose MEA's and OROCA's provide 1000 ft of obstacle clearace normally, but 2000 in designated mountainlous areas? If you're IFR, you're not going to be clearing that peak by less than 2000 ft, and that is going to keep you out of the rocks in even the worst case scenario. If you're VFR, then you can see the peak and don't really need the altimeter anyway. I don't buy it. On a good weather day in California it is not uncommon for the alimeter setting itself to account for 500 ft altimeter errors in the mountains. If you add up non-standard lapse rate, cold air and old and distant altimeter settings you can eat into the 2000 feet rather quickly. Then deal with turbulent air and downdrafts in the mountains on top of this. I don't like it one bit. Go land on a 2000 foot runway and tell me that's plenty of room between a little airplane with poor climb performance and a big mountain that you can't see. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael" wrote in message om... Let's not forget that the worst case temperature error at 200 ft and -50C is only 60 ft, while altimeters can be up to 75 ft off in some cases and still be legal for IFR use. There used to be a DH penalty for an inop middle marker (either at the transmitter or receiver end) but this penalty no longer applies. All this ignores the possibility that the pilost has a RADAR altimeter available. In the US, it is up to the pilot to decide whether in his particular situation, given the available equipment and his skills, he should adjust the minima as appropriate based on the expected temperature error. Michael I've never seen, nor heard of a temperatures of -68F (at low airport-type altitudes) that was not associated with an inversion. I suppose that it might happen in Anarctica in the winter but there aren't any airports there. In Alaska, when its -40F on the surface it is usually at least 0F at 1000' AGL. Mike MU-2 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm sure that in this case you are referring to the ICAO Cold Temperature Error Table, which is part of the AIM. Check it out online: http://www1.faa.gov/ATPubs/AIM/Chap7/aim0702.html#7-2-3 I don't know about you, but I have yet to meet a US flight instructor who does not require his students to have a copy of the AIM and be conversant with it. Uh. That table only showed up a couple of years ago. I bet most flight instructors have no idea its even there. Other than "hot to cold look out below" there ain't much on temperature errors in the FAA private pilot knowledge requirements. The reason that table finally showed up is because pilots familiar with Canadian and USAF procedures have been pushing the FAA to improve this area of pilot knowledge. We are not REQUIRED to do anything about those tables. If you're flying over mountains in Alaska on a cold night with an alitimeter setting from sea level? You can tell that to the granite. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Different WAAS altitude readings | Wyatt Emmerich | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | June 29th 04 07:27 PM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
WAAS question -- altitude accuracy? | Craig Davidson | Piloting | 10 | September 23rd 03 09:56 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |