![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Margy,
The Wright Experience replica is VERY accurate. The only modification made was the type of glue used in the prop. The fabric was manufactured to match the original. It's amazing. I know. I've seen it. But the question referred to the NC one. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Margy, The Wright Experience replica is VERY accurate. The only modification made was the type of glue used in the prop. The fabric was manufactured to match the original. It's amazing. I know. I've seen it. But the question referred to the NC one. The NC one is the the Wright Experience one. The one that will fly (or attempt to at lease) on Dec. 17 at Kitty Hawk is that one. The one that crashed is the one from the WBAC in Dayton (well W. Milton actoually). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron,
the original poster quoted a replica from Ohio. That's not the Wright Experience, is it? Someone else asked how accurate it was. I don't think any of the replicas except for the Wright Experience's are very accurate. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Ron, the original poster quoted a replica from Ohio. That's not the Wright Experience, is it? Someone else asked how accurate it was. I don't think any of the replicas except for the Wright Experience's are very accurate. No, there's anther group called the "Wright Aeroplane Company" out of the Dayton area. There is YET another group in Virginia making a replica as well (can't remember the name). Ken Hyde's Wright Experience I do know for a fact is extremely accurate. I've talked to the prop guy and Steve Hay (the engine builder) at length. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron,
Ken Hyde's Wright Experience I do know for a fact is extremely accurate. I've talked to the prop guy and Steve Hay (the engine builder) at length. I talked to both and Ken a lot, too. Other replicas have stronger engines, different wing profiles and such stuff. Also, there's the wing spar debate... I saw people at Ken's place tie and untie wire knots again and again until the knot would look exactly like the one on the 1903 photographs. Very different knot from the one on the Smithsonian "original", since Orville restored that one in 1916 presumably tying knots that were used at that time, not 1903. THAT's the level of accuracy they're going for. A totally amazing group! -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Ron, the original poster quoted a replica from Ohio. That's not the Wright Experience, is it? Someone else asked how accurate it was. I don't think any of the replicas except for the Wright Experience's are very accurate. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) The original Wright Flyer is no more. What hangs in the Smithsonian was pieced together well after the wreck on Dec. 17, 1903. There are three sets of blue prints, all drawn well after the fact and all of them have problems. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave,
The original Wright Flyer is no more. What hangs in the Smithsonian was pieced together well after the wreck on Dec. 17, 1903. There are three sets of blue prints, all drawn well after the fact and all of them have problems. I know that. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Stadt" wrote in message .com... The original Wright Flyer is no more. What hangs in the Smithsonian was pieced together well after the wreck on Dec. 17, 1903. But since it was pieced together by Orville Wright, it is absolutely correct. It's just not quite the way it was on December 17, 1903. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Supposedly Orville was very concerned about someone copying the design. So
the one in the Smithsonian is not to the original design. AOPA mag had several articles on this and the differences are significant. "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message news ![]() "Dave Stadt" wrote in message .com... The original Wright Flyer is no more. What hangs in the Smithsonian was pieced together well after the wreck on Dec. 17, 1903. But since it was pieced together by Orville Wright, it is absolutely correct. It's just not quite the way it was on December 17, 1903. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JerryK" wrote in message news:k6ckb.582250$Oz4.560332@rwcrnsc54... Supposedly Orville was very concerned about someone copying the design. So the one in the Smithsonian is not to the original design. AOPA mag had several articles on this and the differences are significant. The 1903 Flyer was returned to Dayton in crates and remained in them until 1916. By then there was no reason to copy the design. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Even Wright 1905 Flyer Replica Fails to Fly | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 1 | December 24th 03 02:23 PM |
The Wright Flyer yesterday | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 2 | December 19th 03 05:32 AM |
Wright Flyer | Dave Hyde | Home Built | 9 | September 29th 03 05:20 PM |
Stop the Wright Flyer from flying in Chicago! | Ace Pilot | Piloting | 0 | August 21st 03 01:36 PM |
Wright Flyer Ignition | Dan Thomas | Home Built | 6 | July 22nd 03 03:45 AM |