A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Runway Lengths



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 16th 03, 05:34 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Just a wild guess, but I would think it is an artifact of the US
sectional/township system. Most property lines are along sectional lines (or
quarters of sectional lines) so runway length may be determined by what is
the longest diagonal that will fit on a square mile.

Either that or there is some FAA reg that involves runways of greater than
5000' that the designers wanted to take advantage of. But even there the reg
probably is based on the biggest runway you can fit on a section.


  #2  
Old October 16th 03, 07:24 PM
'Vejita' S. Cousin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
C J Campbell wrote:
Just a wild guess, but I would think it is an artifact of the US
sectional/township system. Most property lines are along sectional lines (or
quarters of sectional lines) so runway length may be determined by what is
the longest diagonal that will fit on a square mile.

Either that or there is some FAA reg that involves runways of greater than
5000' that the designers wanted to take advantage of. But even there the reg
probably is based on the biggest runway you can fit on a section.


The main runway at BFI (Boeing Field) is also 10,001 ft. I have no
idea why. I always thought it was so that someone can claim: "Our runway
is over 10,000ft" without having to say equal to.

  #3  
Old October 16th 03, 08:41 PM
EDR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , C J Campbell
wrote:

Either that or there is some FAA reg that involves runways of greater than
5000' that the designers wanted to take advantage of. But even there the reg
probably is based on the biggest runway you can fit on a section.


I haven't looked recently, but it would be contained in Part 150.
I do know that 7000 foot runway is considered transport category, so I
suspect that insurance companies may require certain aircraft to be
operated from runways greater than x-thousand feet.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 117 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Owning 114 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
New Ulm, MN (ULM) Airport Runway Extension Study Dan Hoehn General Aviation 1 May 5th 04 03:33 PM
F15E's trounced by Eurofighters John Cook Military Aviation 193 April 11th 04 03:33 AM
AF jets roar again on Osan runway Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 February 23rd 04 09:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.