A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The insane spitfire video clip



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old October 29th 03, 08:40 PM
Do What?
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:05:51 -0600, Do What?
wrote:

On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 14:58:03 -0800, Jeff wrote:

Thats what their patent claims, so far, some of the biggest companies, Hustler,
wicked, Vivid, lodge net, and others, have signed their license agreement. After
our attorney reviewed the patents, we signed it also.


How long ago was this? Your attorney could have easily requested a
stay on the court date until the current lawsuit against Acacia is
settled (which will more than likley invalidate their patents).


Just to correct myself... there is no lawsuit against Acacia, but
there are finally a group of defendants (11) that are well prepared to
challenge the Acacia claim (something that has yet to be done).

Either way, one could make a very strong case for a stay until those
play out in the courts.
  #62  
Old October 29th 03, 10:22 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Anyone else having trouble running them?

Can't run it in Netscape (which I use for usenet). I can cut the URL that

Peter
posted into an IE window and get it to run.


Uh-oh. Anyone here care to help me solve THIS one?

I don't know anything about making something "Netscape capable"...
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #63  
Old October 29th 03, 10:25 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

http://www.acaciatechnologies.com/uspatents_all.htm

Eye...lids...heavy...

Can't...focus...

Must...sleep.....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #64  
Old October 29th 03, 11:57 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Jay Honeck wrote:

Uh-oh. Anyone here care to help me solve THIS one?


Probably not your problem. Ask Corky Scott if he can run it with *his* version
of Netscape. If so, forget about it.

George Patterson
You can dress a hog in a tuxedo, but he still wants to roll in the mud.
  #65  
Old October 29th 03, 11:58 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Larry Dighera wrote:

Aren't patents issued for the purpose of generating law suits? :-)


Certainly the Wright brother's patents were.

George Patterson
You can dress a hog in a tuxedo, but he still wants to roll in the mud.
  #66  
Old October 30th 03, 01:47 AM
Jeff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes, if your on a unix machine you need to add handlers to the srm.conf file,
they would look like:

AddType video/x-ms-asf asf asx
AddType video/x-ms-wmv wmv



Jay Honeck wrote:

Anyone else having trouble running them?


Can't run it in Netscape (which I use for usenet). I can cut the URL that

Peter
posted into an IE window and get it to run.


Uh-oh. Anyone here care to help me solve THIS one?

I don't know anything about making something "Netscape capable"...
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #67  
Old October 30th 03, 01:51 AM
Jeff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

how long ago, last week was when we sent them the check.


Do What? wrote:

If their pantent held *any* weight, companies like Yahoo, MS, AOL, etc
would be the targets.


actually this was asked of them during a live interview, their response was the law
allows them certain latitude, they decided to go after websits because they can make
more money.
But remember they already signed lodgnet (the people who provide in-room movies to
hotels) and are trying to get money from Universities right now.

patent law suits are expensive, its not something you want to fight if you dont have
to.

  #68  
Old October 30th 03, 01:52 AM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes, if your on a unix machine you need to add handlers to the srm.conf
file,
they would look like:

AddType video/x-ms-asf asf asx
AddType video/x-ms-wmv wmv


???

Repeat after me: "Who put the tribbles in the quatro-triticale?!"

(That makes about as much sense to you as your post does to me... :-)
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #69  
Old October 30th 03, 02:00 AM
Jeff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

actually there are law suits against acacia by a couple of different companies. Not
directly against the DMT patents, but as a result of them and ongoings around them.

There is a group (whom I know personally and recently talked to on the phone) who has
been in litigation with acacia for awhile.
This isnt a new thing, its just recently they have been really pushing their license
thing. I think they will win, there is ALOT of people helping them find prior art. We
were first "asked" to sign their license agreement 3 months ago. The company in
litigation was first "ask" to sign it last year.

Do What? wrote:

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:05:51 -0600, Do What?
wrote:

On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 14:58:03 -0800, Jeff wrote:

Thats what their patent claims, so far, some of the biggest companies, Hustler,
wicked, Vivid, lodge net, and others, have signed their license agreement. After
our attorney reviewed the patents, we signed it also.


How long ago was this? Your attorney could have easily requested a
stay on the court date until the current lawsuit against Acacia is
settled (which will more than likley invalidate their patents).


Just to correct myself... there is no lawsuit against Acacia, but
there are finally a group of defendants (11) that are well prepared to
challenge the Acacia claim (something that has yet to be done).

Either way, one could make a very strong case for a stay until those
play out in the courts.


  #70  
Old October 30th 03, 02:30 AM
Jeff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

lol...what kind of server are you on, unix or NT ?

BTW I know what tribbles are, everyone watches star trek


Jay Honeck wrote:

Yes, if your on a unix machine you need to add handlers to the srm.conf

file,
they would look like:

AddType video/x-ms-asf asf asx
AddType video/x-ms-wmv wmv


???

Repeat after me: "Who put the tribbles in the quatro-triticale?!"

(That makes about as much sense to you as your post does to me... :-)
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does anybody know a link to a real picture of the X-43 in flight sans Pegasus or better yet a video clip of the flight? Scott Ferrin Military Aviation 0 April 3rd 04 08:47 PM
Looking for a video clip discussed on this group WAY back. Scott Ferrin Military Aviation 3 January 8th 04 08:22 PM
The insane spitfire video clip Highwood General Aviation 1 November 30th 03 11:48 PM
The insane spitfire video clip gatt General Aviation 30 November 4th 03 06:43 PM
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) The Revolution Will Not Be Televised Military Aviation 20 August 27th 03 09:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.