![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The flight tests in the UK magazines say it's a fabulous aircraft
for personal transport, but it may not make such a good twin trainer as it's just too easy, especially engine handling...they say it doesn't prepare you for the world of Lycontosaurus and the pilot workload needed when one fails. Paul "lance smith" wrote in message om... I'm starting to believe that they can do it. It looks amazing. There was a huge thread on this earlier this year. Do a search in deja.com (in rec.aviation) on "diamond diesel". |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul,
So we can't have innovation because of innovation? Hmm... Sounds like a Catch-22. We should have stayed on the trees... -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Paul Sengupta wrote: The flight tests in the UK magazines say it's a fabulous aircraft for personal transport, but it may not make such a good twin trainer That's probably a good thing. The Twin Comanche got a bad rep because of the accident statistics it accumulated as a twin trainer (back in the day of low-altitude Vmc demonstrations). Besides, even though it's clearly an entry-level twin, and very reasonably priced in today's new plane market, it's still far more expensive than typical trainer fodder like 1960s-era Apaches. -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ben,
and very reasonably priced in today's new plane market, it's still far more expensive than typical trainer fodder like 1960s-era Apaches. Not necessarily if you factor in operating cost. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ben Jackson" wrote in message news:aydob.62964$HS4.558161@attbi_s01... In article , Paul Sengupta wrote: The flight tests in the UK magazines say it's a fabulous aircraft for personal transport, but it may not make such a good twin trainer That's probably a good thing. The Twin Comanche got a bad rep because of the accident statistics it accumulated as a twin trainer (back in the day of low-altitude Vmc demonstrations). Besides, even though it's clearly an entry-level twin, and very reasonably priced in today's new plane market, it's still far more expensive than typical trainer fodder like 1960s-era Apaches. -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ How can you compare a new airplane with new engines and new glass cockpit to a clapped out Apache? Mike MU-2 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike,
How can you compare a new airplane with new engines and new glass cockpit to a clapped out Apache? Simple: Put both on the flight line at a locel FBO for a price that will not make you lose money - and see if pilots go for new or cheap. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
... Simple: Put both on the flight line at a locel FBO for a price that will not make you lose money - and see if pilots go for new or cheap. That doesn't compare the airplanes. It compares the pilots. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter,
That doesn't compare the airplanes. It compares the pilots. I know. But it's a rather practical approach, IMHO ;-) -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
... I know. But it's a rather practical approach, IMHO ;-) Yes, if you want to compare pilots, it is. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:53:03 -0000, Paul Sengupta .
ericsson.se wrote: The flight tests in the UK magazines say it's a fabulous aircraft for personal transport, but it may not make such a good twin trainer as it's just too easy, especially engine handling...they say it doesn't prepare you for the world of Lycontosaurus and the pilot workload needed when one fails. The economics will soon demolish that argument. When you're burning half as much fuel at a third of the cost per litre, and the engines last 1000 hours longer - flight schools know they can offer much better prices with the Diamond twin. They are also new and sexy - the students (most of whom are destined for the airlines) will prefer a flight school that's less expensive and has shiny new planes with nice smooth rivetless wings. Although I like old planes (I owned a 1946 C140), if Diamond can start the move away from the Lycontisaurus to something better, more power to them. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question, Diamond distance as unsuccessful triangle. | Roger | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | November 22nd 04 07:34 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Owning | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Diamond DA-40 | Chuck | Owning | 16 | April 30th 04 08:57 PM |
Diamond Aircraft on Hydrogen Fuel Cells | Raul Ruiz | Piloting | 1 | July 13th 03 11:27 PM |