Perfect electro-magnetic storm

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:51:29 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote:

Perhaps it's time to charter a new newsgroup:
rec.aviation.hangar-flying. ...

What you really want is one of two things:

1. Get used to newsgroup culture. It's the
new Wild West, a frontier without
limits.

2. A moderated newsgroup, e.g.,
rec.aviation.humorless.piloting.moderated

We could post a Request For Discussion in
the rec.aviation.* hierarchy.

RFDs are circulated and debated through
news:news.groups. These are the people
who brought you rec.aviation.piloting and
all of the rec.aviation.* groups. There are rules and
regulations for creating new groups. If you're serious
about starting a new group, I'd be happy to help you
understand the technicalities. If you're not serious,
then you're joking, and that is contrary to the charter
of r.a.p. per your interpretation. :-P

(Rev.) Martin X. Moleski, SJ, Ph.D.
A moderator of news:rec.autos.sport.nascar.moderated
Lurker in r.a.p.

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:41:17 -0500, "Martin X. Moleski, SJ"
wrote in Message-Id:
:

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:51:29 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote:

Perhaps it's time to charter a new newsgroup:
rec.aviation.hangar-flying. ...

What you really want is one of two things:

1. Get used to newsgroup culture. It's the
new Wild West, a frontier without
limits.

I've been posting to usenet since 1984. Believe me, I'm quite used to
its culture. What makes you think I'm not?

2. A moderated newsgroup, e.g.,
rec.aviation.humorless.piloting.moderated

I doubt there would be significant traffic to warrant such a group.
In any event, I do not condone the censorship (be it through
moderation, or other means) of others' rights to free expression of
their thoughts on usenet.

We could post a Request For Discussion in the rec.aviation.* hierarchy.

RFDs are circulated and debated through news:news.groups.

Right. And how are the people who would be interested in such a
discussion notified that it is taking place in
news.announce.newgroups?

From the FAQ:

A request for discussion on creation of a new newsgroup should be
posted to news.announce.newgroups, news.groups, and any other
groups or mailing lists at all related to the proposed topic if
desired. news.announce.newgroups is moderated, and the
Followup-to: header will be set so that the actual discussion
takes place only in news.groups.

My suggestion seems consistent with the FAQ.

These are the people
who brought you rec.aviation.piloting and
all of the rec.aviation.* groups. There are rules and
regulations for creating new groups.

Yep: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/crea...sgroups/part1/

If you're serious
about starting a new group, I'd be happy to help you
understand the technicalities.

Your kind offer is most appreciated. However, I have no difficulty in
understanding the technicalities, thanks.

If you're not serious,
then you're joking, and that is contrary to the charter

If the creation of a hangar-flying newsgroup will divert those who
post frivolity and inanities in the piloting newsgroup to the new one,
I'm serious.