![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi guys
Thank you for all your answers. You were all very helpful. I wanted to practice those patterns because I heard an airline here in Argentina was using them for its sim checkride so I wanted to familiarize myself with them. I think these figures or any combination a CFII will put together can be quite helpful during instrument training specially if they are used as transition bewteen basic attitude flying and instrument approaches. And they can also be very helpful to maintain proficiency. Yesterday I spent a couple of hours in the sim doing many different figures and I thought it helped me improve my scan. Specially after I tried them a second time with no attitude indicator. I had to work real hard but it was also very rewarding. You see, I have about 1500 hs total time but in a recent flight, a checkride for an argentine license, I had no trouble detecting a malfunctioning VOR, negotiating with ATC to do an instrument approach at an internacional airport, inserting my C150 among the flow of B 767s and Airbuses and tracking the ILS altough I had never flown that approach before(in the sim or in the plane). Neither did I have any problems entering holds or approaching VORs from diferent radials. However all through the flight I strugled to maintain my altitude with 100 ft of my asigned one. Or my heading within 10 degrees. The reazons for this is, I think, that I already know way to do instrument approaches. I can brush them up and I do so on a regular basis and that's enough to remember how to read a chart or what kind of entry metod to use to enter a hold. However the only way to fly the aircraft proficently is to fly often. For the last two years I have been flying about once a month and that's hardly enough to be safe. I think in the future I will spend at least part of each simulator shift just working on basics because they are more easily lost. I think it's also fun to try them. I mean, flying an ILS approach can be challenging enough with a good croswind or with weather close the minimuns, but when was the last time you tried to do a 360o turn with 45o of bank, followed by a climb at 400 ft/min. When was the last time you did a 180o turn with a standard rate of turn but doubling your airspeed halfway? It's harder than it sounds believe me, I know. Take care |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Aircrew Training Ensures U.S. Air Superiority | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 9th 04 03:59 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |