A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Violating Airspace with GPS



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 31st 03, 03:00 AM
John Bell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Robert,

I do indeed remember meeting you in Lakeland. Whenever I see one of your
posts, it is like picking up a paper and seeing a byline from a reporter
that I respect.

Actually, my response to Ron Natalie was a little more than tongue in cheek.
It was somewhat of a combination of defensiveness and worry that I might be
spreading bad information. Ron's statement that my explanation of how GPS
works: "while one of the common ones often espoused
has no basis in reality. This is not how GPS works" has me curious.

Unfortunately, Ron's statement unfortunately gives me little to correct my
understanding if it is indeed wrong. Luckily, even if my explanation of how
GPS works is totally incorrect, it should not have serious consequences as
far as usage is concerned.


John

"Robert Moore" wrote in message
. 7...
Larry Dighera wrote

There are very knowledgable folks willing to answer all your
questions there.


:-) :-) Since John has written texts on GPS Navigation, I suspect
that he was pulling someone's leg.

http://www.smallboatgps.com/ http://www.cockpitgps.com/


Hi John, how's things going? Remember meeting at SnF?

Bob Moore



  #2  
Old November 3rd 03, 07:26 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Bell" wrote in message . com...


Actually, my response to Ron Natalie was a little more than tongue in cheek.
It was somewhat of a combination of defensiveness and worry that I might be
spreading bad information. Ron's statement that my explanation of how GPS
works: "while one of the common ones often espoused
has no basis in reality. This is not how GPS works" has me curious.

The "overlapping spheres" model is NOT how GPS works. It's the same as the
stupid flashing light analogy for VOR. It perhaps gives someone some concept,
but it's not accurate at all. The way GPS works is to use pairs of satellites
to determine hyperbolids which are intersected with ones generated from other
pairs.


  #3  
Old November 4th 03, 12:49 AM
John Bell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


The "overlapping spheres" model is NOT how GPS works. It's the same as

the
stupid flashing light analogy for VOR. It perhaps gives someone some

concept,
but it's not accurate at all. The way GPS works is to use pairs of

satellites
to determine hyperbolids which are intersected with ones generated from

other
pairs.



Ron,

I looked up some information. I have not had time to completely digest it,
but I do see how a GPS system could be designed to use pairs of satellites
with hyperboloids. I think that my explanation is sufficient for a pilot
level operational understanding of how GPS works. Among other sources
propagating a similar explanation are Trimble and Garmin, so at least I am
in good company. My purpose is to provide a brief conceptual idea of how
GPS works. The primary purpose of my text is to provide practical guidance
as to how to actually use GPS.

Trimble's explanation is at http://www.trimble.com/gps/how.html. And
Garmin's "GPS for Beginners" is available at
http://www.garmin.com/support/userMa...ory=53&product
=999-99999-20

I did a Google search,
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...id+GPS&spell=1 , and
did find some sources indicating that positioning could be done using pairs
of satellites and the intersection of hyperboloids. I am not sure if GPS
receivers actually use the intersecting hyperploids or intersecting sphere
model in their actual design. It appears that both are different techniques
to solve the same problem.

I am not an electrical engineer and am not sure which explanation is correct
or if they are merely different solutions to the same problem. I appreciate
you responding back to explain why you think my explanation was wrong.


John Bell
www.cockpitgps.com


  #4  
Old November 4th 03, 05:24 AM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


The way GPS works is to use pairs of
satellites to determine hyperbolids which
are intersected with ones generated from
other pairs.


That's the way sailors do it, but they do it by hand using hyperboloids plotted
on their charts.

If there is a mathematically equivalent way to do it, it might be one that is
easier to program into a box, and maybe that's what an aviation GPS does. If
the alternative is not mathematically equivalent, then one of them is just
wrong.

Jose



--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? john smith Home Built 11 August 27th 04 02:29 AM
most of eastern Massachussetts airspace closed in July Christopher C. Stacy Instrument Flight Rules 29 June 19th 04 12:47 AM
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? Larry Dighera Instrument Flight Rules 12 April 26th 04 06:12 PM
Help - I busted into the Class B SEATAC airspace last night, does anyone have any advice ? steve mew Piloting 38 October 28th 03 06:08 PM
FA: Congested Airspace: A Pilot's Guide The Ink Company Aviation Marketplace 0 August 10th 03 05:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.