![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert,
I do indeed remember meeting you in Lakeland. Whenever I see one of your posts, it is like picking up a paper and seeing a byline from a reporter that I respect. Actually, my response to Ron Natalie was a little more than tongue in cheek. It was somewhat of a combination of defensiveness and worry that I might be spreading bad information. Ron's statement that my explanation of how GPS works: "while one of the common ones often espoused has no basis in reality. This is not how GPS works" has me curious. Unfortunately, Ron's statement unfortunately gives me little to correct my understanding if it is indeed wrong. Luckily, even if my explanation of how GPS works is totally incorrect, it should not have serious consequences as far as usage is concerned. John "Robert Moore" wrote in message . 7... Larry Dighera wrote There are very knowledgable folks willing to answer all your questions there. :-) :-) Since John has written texts on GPS Navigation, I suspect that he was pulling someone's leg. http://www.smallboatgps.com/ http://www.cockpitgps.com/ Hi John, how's things going? Remember meeting at SnF? Bob Moore |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Bell" wrote in message . com... Actually, my response to Ron Natalie was a little more than tongue in cheek. It was somewhat of a combination of defensiveness and worry that I might be spreading bad information. Ron's statement that my explanation of how GPS works: "while one of the common ones often espoused has no basis in reality. This is not how GPS works" has me curious. The "overlapping spheres" model is NOT how GPS works. It's the same as the stupid flashing light analogy for VOR. It perhaps gives someone some concept, but it's not accurate at all. The way GPS works is to use pairs of satellites to determine hyperbolids which are intersected with ones generated from other pairs. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The "overlapping spheres" model is NOT how GPS works. It's the same as the stupid flashing light analogy for VOR. It perhaps gives someone some concept, but it's not accurate at all. The way GPS works is to use pairs of satellites to determine hyperbolids which are intersected with ones generated from other pairs. Ron, I looked up some information. I have not had time to completely digest it, but I do see how a GPS system could be designed to use pairs of satellites with hyperboloids. I think that my explanation is sufficient for a pilot level operational understanding of how GPS works. Among other sources propagating a similar explanation are Trimble and Garmin, so at least I am in good company. My purpose is to provide a brief conceptual idea of how GPS works. The primary purpose of my text is to provide practical guidance as to how to actually use GPS. Trimble's explanation is at http://www.trimble.com/gps/how.html. And Garmin's "GPS for Beginners" is available at http://www.garmin.com/support/userMa...ory=53&product =999-99999-20 I did a Google search, http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...id+GPS&spell=1 , and did find some sources indicating that positioning could be done using pairs of satellites and the intersection of hyperboloids. I am not sure if GPS receivers actually use the intersecting hyperploids or intersecting sphere model in their actual design. It appears that both are different techniques to solve the same problem. I am not an electrical engineer and am not sure which explanation is correct or if they are merely different solutions to the same problem. I appreciate you responding back to explain why you think my explanation was wrong. John Bell www.cockpitgps.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The way GPS works is to use pairs of satellites to determine hyperbolids which are intersected with ones generated from other pairs. That's the way sailors do it, but they do it by hand using hyperboloids plotted on their charts. If there is a mathematically equivalent way to do it, it might be one that is easier to program into a box, and maybe that's what an aviation GPS does. If the alternative is not mathematically equivalent, then one of them is just wrong. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |
most of eastern Massachussetts airspace closed in July | Christopher C. Stacy | Instrument Flight Rules | 29 | June 19th 04 12:47 AM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
Help - I busted into the Class B SEATAC airspace last night, does anyone have any advice ? | steve mew | Piloting | 38 | October 28th 03 06:08 PM |
FA: Congested Airspace: A Pilot's Guide | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 10th 03 05:51 PM |