|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
November 16th 03, 10:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Cub Driver wrote:
The Bush administration sure does seem to have a major bug up its ass about forcing ATC privatization - WHY? Cheaper and safer? I can see it potentially being cheaper in total cost, but likely not cheaper for general aviation. I also wonder if it really would be safer. The profit motive is great for economic efficiency, but not always for safety and other parameters that detract from, rather than add to, profitability. Matt 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tower Enroute Control? | Sam Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | June 2nd 04 02:31 AM |
| Control Tower Controversy brewing in the FAA | PlanetJ | Instrument Flight Rules | 168 | December 6th 03 01:51 PM |
| Preferred Routing or Tower Enroute Control | cefarthing | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | November 30th 03 04:53 PM |
| Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 3 | October 1st 03 05:39 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Hybrid Mode
