![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great story, Thanks Big John and Corky Scott.
Man it must have sucked to be on either side during this attack. To go back on topic, I guess letting this quantity of lead loose, it surely would change the Forward CG experience. Pat Thronson "Big John" wrote in message ... Corky The Skip bombing carried over into the P-51's. The technique taught was to drop short of the vessel and let the bomb skip off the water into the side. Fuse was a short delay to let aircraft clear the explosion. By dropping early if the pilot made a mistake and actually dropped late, he would drop directly into the side of the vessel which was a good hit. One skip was ideal but I've see some dropped at high speed and skipped several times before hitting. Remember all pilots felt that speed was a life saver when being shot at in combat. Big John On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:39:42 GMT, (Corky Scott) wrote: On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:46:24 -0500, "Bob Chilcoat" wrote: It's my understanding that after Pappy Gunn had modified a B-25 for straffing, with six 50 Cal Brownings in the nose and a 75mm field howitzer under the floor of the cockpit, and had used it very successfully against Japanese shipping, North American sent an engineer out to see what this lunatic was doing. After looking over Gunn's field modification he just shook his head and asked "Where the hell is the center of gravity?" Gunn just shrugged and told him "Aw, we threw that out to save weight." The engineer went home and North American started mass producing a properly engineered variant of Gunn's cludge, the B-25G. Pappy Gunn did not install any 75mm cannon's if I remember correctly. He felt that the firepower of the .50 caliber machine guns was adaquate, but more than that, he felt that it was necessary to saturate the defenses with a dense volume of bullets to make them keep their heads down while the bombers made their runs to the target. The 75mm installation was done at the North American factory. Gunn never liked it much. The fire rate was slow, it was inaccurate and the recoil and flash were problematic. Most of the 75mm models had their cannon removed from the airplane and replaced with more machine guns once out to the war zone. The skip bombers and the B-25 strafers actually developed side by side, but independant of each concept. Initially, the skip bombing technique was worked up by guys flying four engine bombers, mostly the B-17. They practiced the run-in on a wreck out in Port Moresby's harbor. Kenney always felt the bombers were too unwieldy for this role and about the time a convoy of Japanese ships was detected heading for New Guinea across the Bizmark Sea, he decided to attack it using all his air forces. Several B-17's did make attacks on the transports, but Australian forces made attacks as well. The main thing though was that the B-25 strafers came into their own during this battle. They proved to be extremely effective with their withering fire as they bore in at wavetop height with all their machine guns blazing away. They'd perfected the skip bombing technique by that time, which involved dropping the bombs one by one in quick intervals, usually in a salvo of four. This ensured that at least one would be at the right height to penetrate the hull and detonate inside. The Japanese literally had no counter for this tactic, which has got to be one of the most successful field developed attack techniques of WWII. So deadly was this technique that even the best destroyer captains lost sleep pondering how to counter it, as nothing seemed to work. See "Destroyer Captain" by Hara. It must have been a truly terrifying situation to be in for the Japanese as the B-25's normally attacked in pairs which limited the maneuvering options of the target, no matter how fast and maneuverable it was. The pilots split up and attacked from either side which split the target's AA counterfire. But it did not split the attackers fire. When the B-25's opened up, as many as 8 forward firing heavy machine guns (ten if the top turret was swiveled to fire forward) poured an absolute hail of bullets against the ship which caused even the bravest sailer to flinch or duck for cover. It wasn't all gravy for the B-25's though. Low level attacks like this were extremely dangerous as any battle damage put the airplanes into the ocean or jungle almost immediately. Many were lost. Corky Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dennis Fetters Mini 500 | EmailMe | Home Built | 70 | June 21st 04 09:36 PM |
So Who Has More Military Command Experience, Bush Or Kerry? | W. D. Allen Sr. | Military Aviation | 11 | April 22nd 04 01:27 AM |
So Who Has More Military Command Experience, Bush Or Kerry? | W. D. Allen Sr. | Naval Aviation | 11 | April 19th 04 05:12 PM |
Forward Swept Wings | Canuck Bob | Home Built | 16 | October 3rd 03 05:50 PM |