A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GAO Report: GA Security Threat



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 19th 03, 05:55 PM
Ian Graeme
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thomas Borchert wrote:

John,


Have you been following the news lately, at all?


Are you trying to make a point?



Yes. The point: If what's happening in Iraq is "winning a war", then
the definitions of "winning" must have changed dramatically since I
last checked.


No, it's just that your standard of acceptable information needs some
fine-tuning. Instead of buying into the Six O'clock Follies as the SOLE
source, do some checking. HOW many thousands of US personnel are in
Iraq? All you hear about are the handful who die.

Well, guess what? Servicemen die in the US, too. Helicopters crash in
the US too. And there are Army bases whose commanders have had to order
troops not to wear uniforms offbase because the locals don't treat the
military well.

.. . .and there's no war going on here, is there?






  #2  
Old November 19th 03, 08:15 PM
Kevin Horton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:55:58 +0000, Ian Graeme wrote:

And there are Army bases whose commanders have had to order troops not
to wear uniforms offbase because the locals don't treat the military
well.


This would be a lot easier to believe with a few details that could
be checked against other sources.

Which bases do you have in mind and how many have been killed off base in
the last year just because they were servicemen?

--
Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit)
Ottawa, Canada
http://go.phpwebhosting.com/~khorton/rv8/
e-mail: khorton02(_at_)rogers(_dot_)com

  #3  
Old November 20th 03, 01:05 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...
| John,
|
| Have you been following the news lately, at all?
|
| Are you trying to make a point?
|
|
| Yes. The point: If what's happening in Iraq is "winning a war", then
| the definitions of "winning" must have changed dramatically since I
| last checked.
|

Are you suggesting that Saddam is winning the war? Then you have an even
stranger definition of 'winning.'


  #4  
Old November 20th 03, 01:45 AM
Kevin Horton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:05:04 -0800, C J Campbell wrote:


"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
... | John,
|
| Have you been following the news lately, at all? |
| Are you trying to make a point?
|
|
| Yes. The point: If what's happening in Iraq is "winning a war", then
the | definitions of "winning" must have changed dramatically since I
last | checked.
|
|
Are you suggesting that Saddam is winning the war? Then you have an even
stranger definition of 'winning.'


It looks to me like no one is winning this war.

Saddam certainly lost. His supporters and military lost. The people in
Iraq who opposed the regime will quite likely be crushed again once the US
leaves and the Bathists have even more free rein than they have now. So
they too will probably eventually lose.

The concept of a UN able to solve major international crisis certainly
lost.

If there were WMD, they seem to have gone underground, quite possibly into
the hands of al Qaeda, which would make the US less safe than before the
invasion.

If there were no WMD (which is what most of the world outside the US now
believes), then the US has lost a huge amount of credibility, and even
fewer countries will be willing to come running next time the US cries
"Wolf".

The US taxpayer has certainly lost. There is little hope of other
countries picking up the bill for what they consider a war that was
started under false pretenses.

The only people who are wining are those who delight in having even more
people mad enough at the US that they can convert them into terrorists.
This war surely created many thousands more prospective terrorists. This
is the greatest recruiting campaign al Qaeda ever dreamed of, all funded
by the US taxpayer.

The US military certainly won the "offical" war, but the peace seems to be
slipping through their fingers. The whole point of the exercise was to
make the US safer, and that does not seem likely now.



--
Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit)
Ottawa, Canada
http://go.phpwebhosting.com/~khorton/rv8/
e-mail: khorton02(_at_)rogers(_dot_)com

  #5  
Old November 20th 03, 08:40 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

C,

Are you suggesting that Saddam is winning the war? Then you have an even
stranger definition of 'winning.'


Read the thread. The OP said: "We have won the war in Iraq". That's a
ridiculous statement.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ISRAELI LINK IN US TORTURE TECHNIQUES MORRIS434 Naval Aviation 0 May 12th 04 05:14 AM
ISRAELI LINK IN US TORTURE TECHNIQUES MORRIS434 Military Aviation 0 May 12th 04 05:13 AM
Maybe GWB isn't lying........ JD Naval Aviation 9 February 21st 04 12:41 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM
GAO Report: GA Security Threat GreenPilot Home Built 118 November 26th 03 06:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.