![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:M3Xvb.82855$Dw6.399228@attbi_s02... God created everything that we do not yet understand. Electricity used to be "God's will" -- now it's commonplace. A generation ago showing a live image of someone world-wide would have been considered a miracle -- now you can see Britney Spears on a stupid awards show, anywhere in the world. Why, flight itself would have been considered the work of God 101 years ago -- now we recreate it at will, daily. So has God created everything that we do not yet understand, or is it just a matter of time before we understand *everything*? You answered your question with your examples. At some point we will understand everything. Genetic engineering will soon allow us to "create man in his own image." And that is just the start. Of course, even when something is understood and explainable, the "fanatics" will not accept it. They would rather live in a fantasy world. What is this "it" the "fanatics" will not accept? -- I guess the answer to that depends on what religion the fanatics belong to. Off the top of my head we have evolution for the Christians and equality of the sexes for the Moslems. Earl G. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earl,
At some point we will understand everything. Genetic engineering will soon allow us to "create man in his own image." And that is just the start. Well, putting man in a central role like that lead to the belief of the sun circling the earth, too. Why would we soon understand anything? Nothing is even remotely supporting that statement. And why should we, too? -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Earl Grieda" wrote in message hlink.net... "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:M3Xvb.82855$Dw6.399228@attbi_s02... God created everything that we do not yet understand. Electricity used to be "God's will" -- now it's commonplace. A generation ago showing a live image of someone world-wide would have been considered a miracle -- now you can see Britney Spears on a stupid awards show, anywhere in the world. Why, flight itself would have been considered the work of God 101 years ago -- now we recreate it at will, daily. So has God created everything that we do not yet understand, or is it just a matter of time before we understand *everything*? You answered your question with your examples. At some point we will understand everything. Genetic engineering will soon allow us to "create man in his own image." And that is just the start. Might big assumption :-) Of course, even when something is understood and explainable, the "fanatics" will not accept it. They would rather live in a fantasy world. What is this "it" the "fanatics" will not accept? -- I guess the answer to that depends on what religion the fanatics belong to. Off the top of my head we have evolution for the Christians and equality of the sexes for the Moslems. Earl G. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earl Grieda wrote:
I guess the answer to that depends on what religion the fanatics belong to. Off the top of my head we have evolution for the Christians I am continually amazed at how wrong both the religious and secularist are on evolution. I like the the way a biology teacher I once had put it. He said something like this, evolution is a proven fact, it happens every day. If your going to get all caught up on the issue of whether or not men evolved from apes you are missing the point. Every living thing evolves to adapt to it's surroundings as they change. Just because evolution is a fact, it doesn't mean that men evolved from apes. Although Darwin put that forth as a possibility, through further study he eventually came to the conclusion that men did NOT evolve from apes. -- Chris W "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris W wrote:
I am continually amazed at how wrong both the religious and secularist are on evolution. I like the the way a biology teacher I once had put it. He said something like this, evolution is a proven fact, it happens every day. If your going to get all caught up on the issue of whether or not men evolved from apes you are missing the point. Every living thing evolves to adapt to it's surroundings as they change. Just because evolution is a fact, it doesn't mean that men evolved from apes. Although Darwin put that forth as a possibility, through further study he eventually came to the conclusion that men did NOT evolve from apes. A few years ago, Discover magazine had a column in which the author was relating an experience he once had teaching biology. He had two skeletons in his classroom, and he asked his students to study them to determine which one was from a male and which was from a female. One student immediately came up and said he didn't have to examine the skeletons, because he would be able to tell just by counting the ribs. The instructor told the student to go back anyway and check that hypothesis. A few minutes later, the student was back with a very distressed look on his face. He asked the instructor if he was _sure_ that the skeletons were male and female. The instructor said that yes, he was sure. They had come from a reputable scientific supply house that advertised them as such, and even if he didn't trust them there were several characteristics that lead him to that conclusion anyway. Then he asked the student why the student was so confused. The response, as he expected, was "because they both have the same number of ribs." The instructor was finally able to convince the student that this was a flawed argument regardless of whether or not you interpreted the story of Adam and Eve literally. To me, the sad part of the whole exchange was the fact that the student was unwilling to challenge what he already "knew" was true. Rich Lemert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |