![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#311
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan,
This is the basis of much of the pseudo-science religionists are currently attempting to force into public school curricula. It is known as the "God of the gaps." IOW, if I don't understand it, God did it. I know - and I hate it. Teach children to be skeptical, teach them to accept that they can't know everything and there'S no reason to be afraid of that. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#312
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter,
during the early phases of the big bang. True. But that's been over for a while ;-) -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#313
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin,
Just check what is printed on your money. And then check the constitution. VERY disturbing. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#314
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry,
Is the truth any less true just because someone chooses not to believe it? A truth that needs "believing in" is not a truth. Read that definition again! -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#315
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Luke wrote:
Absolutely. But true, l-f capitalism must inevitably produce economic colossi that can suppress competition and freedom. That's what has happened and is currently happening in pretty much every industry in this country right now. -- Chris W "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania |
#316
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Larry, Is the truth any less true just because someone chooses not to believe it? A truth that needs "believing in" is not a truth. Read that definition again! Just because no one can currently prove something doesn't mean it isn't true. One day we will all know if it is truth or not. True or False: I will have my PPL by the end of next year. I believe it is true, you may not, but what either of us believe is irrelevant as to weather it is true or not. We will both have to wait till the end of next year to find out. -- Chris W "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania |
#317
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Fransson wrote:
Is the truth any less true just because someone chooses not to believe it? Of course not. But I've never fully understood why bible-thumpers expect non-believers to be persuaded by an argument that essentially boils down to "It's true because I say it's true" (e.g. the lead article in this thread), or "It's true because it says so in the bible". Part of the explanation why such poor argumentation technique can nevertheless lead to converts, I think, lies in promises made by Evangelical Christianity. The slate of a wasted life of immorality and corruption can be wiped clean and eternal salvation guaranteed by doing nothing more than accepting Jesus Christ as your savior. What a deal! Jim Rosinski N3825Q |
#318
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earl Grieda wrote:
I guess the answer to that depends on what religion the fanatics belong to. Off the top of my head we have evolution for the Christians I am continually amazed at how wrong both the religious and secularist are on evolution. I like the the way a biology teacher I once had put it. He said something like this, evolution is a proven fact, it happens every day. If your going to get all caught up on the issue of whether or not men evolved from apes you are missing the point. Every living thing evolves to adapt to it's surroundings as they change. Just because evolution is a fact, it doesn't mean that men evolved from apes. Although Darwin put that forth as a possibility, through further study he eventually came to the conclusion that men did NOT evolve from apes. -- Chris W "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania |
#319
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jim rosinski wrote:
Of course not. But I've never fully understood why bible-thumpers expect non-believers to be persuaded by an argument that essentially boils down to "It's true because I say it's true" (e.g. the lead article in this thread), or "It's true because it says so in the bible". Part of the explanation why such poor argumentation technique can nevertheless lead to converts, I think, lies in promises made by Evangelical Christianity. The slate of a wasted life of immorality and corruption can be wiped clean and eternal salvation guaranteed by doing nothing more than accepting Jesus Christ as your savior. What a deal! Not all religions believe it is just a simple matter of accepting Jesus Christ. Also, while many try and use the poor argument you described to "convert" people, I think anyone that really understands scripture, knows that no argument made by anyone can truly convert, if a person is to be converted, that is something that must happen between them and God. All proselyting is for is to introduce others to a believe, the conversion is then completely out of the hands of the proselyter. -- Chris Woodhouse 3147 SW 127th St. Oklahoma City, OK 73170 405-691-5206 N35° 20.492' W97° 34.342' "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania |
#320
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2003-11-23 10:29:57 -0800, Thomas Borchert said:
Larry, Is the truth any less true just because someone chooses not to believe it? A truth that needs "believing in" is not a truth. Read that definition again! I would agree that the truth does not need belief in order to be true. No problem. But when a statement is made, whether it be truth or not, there is a choice - believe, or do not believe. A choice not to believe a statement of truth does not make it any less true. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |