![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Astley wrote:
As others have said, I wouldn't worry too much about a squeeze at CDW if they're not going to increase the length of 4/22. When will they be finished paving that thing anyway? Some time between December and when the sun dies out. Maybe. Actually, every time I think to, I ask ground this question as I taxi back to the RN tie-down. The latest I've heard is "maybe January", but they typically complain that they've no better information that we do. I'd feel better about it if I saw more people working there more often. I've heard stories about the *army* that repaved Linden's 9/27. Where's our army? At lunch? [...] If anything, the smaller airports in the area are more likely to be affected, e.g. N07. For example, the NDB or GPS 01 approach at N07 has been NOTAM'd out for several months now. The NDB (in this case MOREE) is working fine (you get vectors to it southbound when departing IFR) but even if it wasn't, that shouldn't be a reason to NOTAM out the GPS. The rumor is that ATC just doesn't want to deal with it since the approach starts over MOREE which happens to be the MM for MMU 23. I don't know. I've been given the NDB-A into CDW (when I request it), which also starts at MOREE. Not that any of the approaches to N07 are terribly useful (the MDA is pattern altitude), but I expect the southbound approaches will disappear altogether. My favorite of all FBOs I've ever visited is LPA at Lincoln Park. They also have nice aircraft (newish 172s) for rent. But the lack of real IFR utility at the airport kept me from becoming a regular there. - Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|