A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Overweight takeoff / flight



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 27th 03, 12:40 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Greg Esres" wrote in message
news
Then you haven't read Part 23.


Yes, I have.

Let me point out the sections to you:


Those sections stipulate, given an existing Va, how the control surfaces
must be designed. They do not in any way define Va.

The point is that at Part 23 doesn't require this. And not all
aircraft publish such variations.


You are still hung up thinking that Part 23 is what makes airplanes fly.

Again, you didn't read what I wrote. I said it doesn't scale UP.
Flying over max gross may increase maneuvering speed, but it doesn't
increase VA, because the increased weight won't protect control
surfaces from failure.


In this context "maneuvering speed" is synonymous with "Va". Yes, you're
right, there is only ONE Va. But in the world of piloting, we commonly
understand the shorthand "Va" to mean "maneuvering speed at a given aircraft
weight" where the weight is changeable.

Tangent? It's the essence of what Va is.


Not in this context it's not.

I seriously doubt Todd has told you that Va remains the same
regardless of aircraft weight. You obviously misunderstood him.

Ok, you read what he wrote and tell me:


If you think that he was explaining the aerodynamics of maneuvering speed,
you misunderstood him. If you don't think that he was explaining the
aerodynamics of maneuvering speed, then your comments based on that quote
are irrelevant to this thread.

Pete


  #2  
Old November 27th 03, 02:08 AM
Greg Esres
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

we commonly understand the shorthand "Va" to mean "maneuvering speed
at a given aircraft weight" where the weight is changeable.

Then what is commonly understood is not correct, because that's not
how Va is *necessarily* determined.

Not in this context it's not.

PARTICULARLY in this context. The control surfaces were designed with
withstand full movements at PUBLISHED Va, not his new, derived, HIGHER
Va.


  #3  
Old November 27th 03, 07:32 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Greg Esres" wrote in message
...
PARTICULARLY in this context. The control surfaces were designed with
withstand full movements at PUBLISHED Va, not his new, derived, HIGHER
Va.


There are any number of structural issues raised by overgross flight. It
was clear to me which one he was asking about, and the control surfaces
ain't it.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights Geoffrey Sinclair Military Aviation 3 September 4th 09 06:31 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk Jehad Internet Military Aviation 0 February 7th 04 04:24 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.