A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bible-beater pilots



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 28th 03, 01:25 AM
L Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wdtabor wrote:

Litigation being what it is, you have to have insuarnce to practice, or you
risk losong everything you own.

Actually, you don't have to have insurance to practice. Like you say,
you do risk losing
everything, but then again there are many people willing to take that
risk - some because
they "know" it will never happen to them, some because they're trying to
make as much
money as fast as they can, and some because they can't get insurance.

Further, most banks and dental insurance
companies will not do business with you if you are not insured.

But then again, if your unscrupulous enough to run an uninsured
dentistry practice,
what makes you think you'll have any trouble finding equally
unscrupulous banks and
insurance companies.

Aside from which, I could forge a license just as easily as as I could forge a
certificate of insurance. No one checks validity except the dental insurance
companies you contract with. They verify it with the carrier.

I'm sorry, but this looks like your trying to make a circular
argument. It sounds like
your saying that the only people that check for your license are the
insurance companies,
and they only check with themselves.

Rich Lemert





  #2  
Old November 28th 03, 01:14 PM
Wdtabor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article k.net, L Smith
writes:

Aside from which, I could forge a license just as easily as as I could forge

a
certificate of insurance. No one checks validity except the dental insurance
companies you contract with. They verify it with the carrier.

I'm sorry, but this looks like your trying to make a circular
argument. It sounds like
your saying that the only people that check for your license are the
insurance companies,
and they only check with themselves.


Perhaps I was unclear.

Dental insurance companies are not the same companies that sell dental
professional liability insurance.

The dental insurance companies who enter into managed care agreements like PPO
plans wish to avoid secondary liability, so they require dentist who contract
with them to be insured for liability, and verify that coverage with the
liability insurers.

Aside from which, if licensing were eliminated, it would be to my advantage to
have proof of insurance on display and easily verified, just like home repair
companies include the fact that they are bonded in their advertising.

There just really isn't anything accomplished *for the public good* by
licensing that the private sector cannot do better. Licensing only serves to
restrain trade by preventing dentists from moving from one state to another to
follow demand. Florida is famous for that in the profession, getting a Florida
license is almost impossible if you are not from there. The Florida dentists
fear an influx of semi-retired older dentists coming to the state and flooding
the market, lowering fees. The result is that dentistry in FLorida is far more
expensive than unrestrained supply and demand would dictate. (Same thing for
Texas and Hawaii)


--
Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS
PP-ASEL
Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG
  #3  
Old November 28th 03, 03:32 PM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


There just really isn't anything accomplished *for the public good* by
licensing that the private sector cannot do better.


To the presmise that the insurance companies evaluate risk better than the
licensing agencies and the public, how do you account for the fact that to
insure a club with a twin costs upwards of five times as much as a club that
has only single engine airplanes that fly IFR at night with one pilot.

Seems somebody hasn't a clue, and I'm not sure which it is.

Jose



--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Dover short pilots since vaccine order Roman Bystrianyk Naval Aviation 0 December 29th 04 12:47 AM
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? No Spam! Military Aviation 120 January 27th 04 10:19 AM
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? No Spam! General Aviation 3 December 23rd 03 08:53 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.