![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think we've passed the 80:20 point on this debate so I'll let it rest.
Needless to say I don't agree with all you say, but you've raised some point of which awareness can only be a positive thing for me and other readers. "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... The problem that started this discussion is one of the length of time an aircraft is expected to sit on a runway. Five, ten, maybe even fifteen seconds to wait for an IFR clearance seems perfectly reasonable. But several minutes? No, not to me it doesn't. No that wasn't what I intended, though I can see why you interpreted it that way. I said it could be minutes between an aircraft receiving an IFR clearance at the hold and being in a position to take off. In most cases I would expect a clearance to come during the backtrack and to be available on turnaround, within seconds. I don't think ATC would leave an aircraft sitting there for minutes unless they anticipated a clearance from another facility that didn't come. Finally, let me remind you that the comment to which I took issue was the "not sure why there's such a strong aversion to this." The bottom line here is that the reason for the aversion is clear. There are definitely safety issues, regardless of how significant you think they are. You might as well say "not sure why there's such a strong aversion to spiders". After all, all but a handful of spiders are safe. Yet, no one should be surprised when they come across another person who has a strong aversion to spiders. It's only natural. Your apparent argument to the contrary is a bit puzzling to me, to say the least. I think you do yourself no favours with that argument as fear of spiders tends to be an irrational fear. You've eloquently outlined the hazards that give rise to your aversion to sitting on the runway for longer than necessary. They are quite rational, even if we disagree about the magnitude of the risk. Julian Scarfe |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Julian Scarfe" wrote in message
... I think you do yourself no favours with that argument as fear of spiders tends to be an irrational fear. I never said the fear of spiders was entirely rational. My point is that the fear is understandable. Likewise, whether you believe the fear of position-and-hold is rational or not, it is certainly understandable. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Associate Publisher Wanted - Aviation & Business Journals | Mergatroide | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 13th 04 08:26 PM |
Associate Publisher Wanted - Aviation & Business Journals | Mergatroide | General Aviation | 1 | January 13th 04 08:26 PM |
MSNBC Reporting on GA Security Threat | Scott Schluer | Piloting | 44 | November 23rd 03 02:50 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |