![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's what I have against many organized religions, they allow the
membership to break their own covenants and continue on as if nothing ever happened. Agree 100%. In fact, one of the main problems we had with Catholicism was the fact that every Catholic church in America seemed to interpret the laws of the church differently. For example, if you are Catholic, you are forbidden from using birth control -- period. No ifs, ands or buts about it, you are FORBIDDEN from taking the Pill, or using a condom. Yet the vast majority of American "Catholic" women admit to using birth control. Worse, the churches themselves do this little "nudge-nudge, wink-wink" thing around the issue, allowing their members to continue in the church even thought they know about the transgressors. Not that I have anything against birth control -- I don't -- but if you want to call yourself a "Catholic", follow their rules. If you want to use the Pill, fine -- just don't make a sham of the church and call yourself a "Catholic". It's this kind of utter hypocrisy that drove Mary and me away from organized religion. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"More and more people are leaving the Church and going back to God."
(Lenny Bruce) Jim "Jay Honeck" shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: - -It's this kind of utter hypocrisy that drove Mary and me away from organized -religion. Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And that is precisely why you should respect these folks you had a hard time
with - they were at least acting consistently with their religion. Instead of bad-mouthing them you should recognize at least that they were not being hypocrites like you feel that all the rest of organized religion. "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:vYPxb.338356$HS4.2896996@attbi_s01... That's what I have against many organized religions, they allow the membership to break their own covenants and continue on as if nothing ever happened. Agree 100%. In fact, one of the main problems we had with Catholicism was the fact that every Catholic church in America seemed to interpret the laws of the church differently. For example, if you are Catholic, you are forbidden from using birth control -- period. No ifs, ands or buts about it, you are FORBIDDEN from taking the Pill, or using a condom. Yet the vast majority of American "Catholic" women admit to using birth control. Worse, the churches themselves do this little "nudge-nudge, wink-wink" thing around the issue, allowing their members to continue in the church even thought they know about the transgressors. Not that I have anything against birth control -- I don't -- but if you want to call yourself a "Catholic", follow their rules. If you want to use the Pill, fine -- just don't make a sham of the church and call yourself a "Catholic". It's this kind of utter hypocrisy that drove Mary and me away from organized religion. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And that is precisely why you should respect these folks you had a hard
time with - they were at least acting consistently with their religion. Instead of bad-mouthing them you should recognize at least that they were not being hypocrites like you feel that all the rest of organized religion. Augh! Talk about "damned if you do, damned if you don't"... I don't think a person has to be rude to be true to ones faith. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Hertz" wrote:
And that is precisely why you should respect these folks you had a hard time with - they were at least acting consistently with their religion. What is that, an excuse? We should respect rude, aggressive proselytizers because they are able to convince themselves God wants them to behave that way? Islamic terrorists use that exact rationalization. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Um, no - he was free to leave any time. He joined them for a meal, they
chatted about stuff, then the topic came to religion. What is rude? Just say "Sorry, bye." and go on your way. No need to make fun of people or name call. I think the terrorism thing is a bit overstated, don't you? Not at all the same thing. What was aggressive? Jay could have walked away any time, or asked to drop the subject. I think the religion thing is a waste of time, however I am at least respectful of people's religions - especially the ones that are consistent. "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Richard Hertz" wrote: And that is precisely why you should respect these folks you had a hard time with - they were at least acting consistently with their religion. What is that, an excuse? We should respect rude, aggressive proselytizers because they are able to convince themselves God wants them to behave that way? Islamic terrorists use that exact rationalization. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It can be uncomfortable to leave in that situation. Especially after one has
already started eating. Some might feel they are being rude to leave. (I wouldn't in this situation) And you've already got your food started, you silverware being used, your drink on the table. You napkin unfolded or whatever. It's just plain a pain in the ass to have to move. However, after asking once to change the subject, if it didn't change I'd make as many trips as necessary to get as far away from them as possible. And I'd probably (now this is me talking) make as big a production as I could of it. Might just embarass them enough to knock it off next time. Probably not, though. mike regish "Richard Hertz" wrote in message t... Um, no - he was free to leave any time. He joined them for a meal, they chatted about stuff, then the topic came to religion. What is rude? Just say "Sorry, bye." and go on your way. No need to make fun of people or name call. I think the terrorism thing is a bit overstated, don't you? Not at all the same thing. What was aggressive? Jay could have walked away any time, or asked to drop the subject. I think the religion thing is a waste of time, however I am at least respectful of people's religions - especially the ones that are consistent. "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Richard Hertz" wrote: And that is precisely why you should respect these folks you had a hard time with - they were at least acting consistently with their religion. What is that, an excuse? We should respect rude, aggressive proselytizers because they are able to convince themselves God wants them to behave that way? Islamic terrorists use that exact rationalization. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
whatever. It's just plain a pain in the ass to have to move. However,
after asking once to change the subject, if it didn't change I'd make as many trips as necessary to get as far away from them as possible. And I'd probably (now this is me talking) make as big a production as I could of it. Might just embarass them enough to knock it off next time. Probably not, though. In my younger days (and if Mary was not with me), I most certainly would have done exactly THAT. Nowadays, I'm so danged mellow, I'll put up with just about anything -- especially if there's an all-you-can-eat buffet nearby.... ;-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard Hertz wrote: And that is precisely why you should respect these folks you had a hard time with - they were at least acting consistently with their religion. I suppose you have a great deal of respect for telemarketers too? George Patterson Some people think they hear a call to the priesthood when what they really hear is a tiny voice whispering "It's indoor work with no heavy lifting". |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Richard Hertz wrote: And that is precisely why you should respect these folks you had a hard time with - they were at least acting consistently with their religion. I suppose you have a great deal of respect for telemarketers too? He probably is one. George Patterson Some people think they hear a call to the priesthood when what they really hear is a tiny voice whispering "It's indoor work with no heavy lifting". |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |