![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Rapoport" writes:
Well there is no maitenance on connecting rods and crankshafts. But do you agree that components that require maintenance (propeller, cylinders, engine mounts, ...) can cause/accelerate crankshaft failures? --kyler |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kyler Laird" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" writes: Well there is no maitenance on connecting rods and crankshafts. But do you agree that components that require maintenance (propeller, cylinders, engine mounts, ...) can cause/accelerate crankshaft failures? Nah...Mike says you can completely neglect them. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suppose that I agree to a limited extent, but virtually all
crankshaft/connecting rod failures are caused by a flaw/fault in design/manufacture or installation. Once the crank or connecting rod is installed, nothing is done to it and it is unseen until overhaul time. A failure of either of these components is not going to put much, if any, metal into the oil until the bitter end either.. Mike MU-2 "Kyler Laird" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" writes: Well there is no maitenance on connecting rods and crankshafts. But do you agree that components that require maintenance (propeller, cylinders, engine mounts, ...) can cause/accelerate crankshaft failures? --kyler |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Rapoport" writes:
But do you agree that components that require maintenance (propeller, cylinders, engine mounts, ...) can cause/accelerate crankshaft failures? I suppose that I agree to a limited extent, but virtually all crankshaft/connecting rod failures are caused by a flaw/fault in design/manufacture or installation. Once the crank or connecting rod is installed, nothing is done to it and it is unseen until overhaul time. A failure of either of these components is not going to put much, if any, metal into the oil until the bitter end either.. I was thinking less of metal in the oil than the forces exerted on the crankshaft. An out-of-balance prop or even a faulty spark plug can cause out-of-spec. impluses to be exerted on the crankshaft. I sure don't know how significant that is likely to be though. ('course you can consider the stories of pilots taking off after prop. strikes as an extreme.) --kyler |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kyler
Another true (War) story. T-28A 7 cyl 900 HP engine. (128+ HP per cyl) 2 blade Aero-Products prop (big wide paddle blades to absorb HP) Prop shaft cut with a square corner where it transitioned to throw. At original cruise rpm viborations/stresses caused prop shaft to break off and prop depart plane. Result - dead stick with prop missing. Fixes tried. 1. Tried 3 blade prop which reduced stress on crank - worked but cost too much to throw away the relatively new 2 blade props and get new 3 blade props. 2. Dissambled engine and under cut (rounded) square corner betweem shaft and throw. More failures. 3. Set up a restricted rpm range that could be transitioned but not fly steady state in. 4. Raised cruise rpm 150 rpm changing stress on crank. These two worked but reduced range and duraation a lot. Had to refuel after every training mission vs flying two missions on one load of fuel. Looks like this true life story supports both sides of the argument? Big John On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 20:09:35 GMT, Kyler Laird wrote: "Mike Rapoport" writes: But do you agree that components that require maintenance (propeller, cylinders, engine mounts, ...) can cause/accelerate crankshaft failures? I suppose that I agree to a limited extent, but virtually all crankshaft/connecting rod failures are caused by a flaw/fault in design/manufacture or installation. Once the crank or connecting rod is installed, nothing is done to it and it is unseen until overhaul time. A failure of either of these components is not going to put much, if any, metal into the oil until the bitter end either.. I was thinking less of metal in the oil than the forces exerted on the crankshaft. An out-of-balance prop or even a faulty spark plug can cause out-of-spec. impluses to be exerted on the crankshaft. I sure don't know how significant that is likely to be though. ('course you can consider the stories of pilots taking off after prop. strikes as an extreme.) --kyler |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
V-8 powered Seabee | Corky Scott | Home Built | 212 | October 2nd 04 11:45 PM |
Dennis Fetters Mini 500 | EmailMe | Home Built | 70 | June 21st 04 09:36 PM |
My Engine Fire!! | [email protected] | Owning | 1 | March 31st 04 01:41 PM |
Engine... Overhaul? / Replace? advice please | text news | Owning | 11 | February 17th 04 04:44 PM |
Gasflow of VW engine | Veeduber | Home Built | 4 | July 14th 03 08:06 AM |