Big Kahunas

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 16:37:13 -0600 Big John wrote:

David

David. Once more. I just don't suffer fools and sleep soundly.

You Texas 'Two Step' around the original post and now instead of
acknowledging the short combings of the last Democratic
administration, you blow hot air and try to overwhelm all with Crap.

Take your last shot. You've got GW for five more years so drop your
pants, bend over and joy it.

Big John

gone----------------------------------------
*
*
*
plonk

Looks like you're new to usenet. Don't get too worked up. I hope you
don't plonk everyone you disagree with. But then again I guess that's
the republican way. So little tolerance for opposing or alternate views.


R. Hubbell




On 03 Dec 2003 22:59:11 -0600, David Dyer-Bennet
wrote:

Big John writes:

David

You didn't directly address my "lie, steal and cheat".
`````````````````````````````````````````````````` ```````````````````````````````
Stood up on TV and admitted to the world that he "lied".

More than any other president has done. He seems to actually value
integrity.

Stole furniture from White House when he left and had to return it
(WSJ and other sources)

Widely debunked.

Cheated on Hillery (admitted on TV)

Big deal. I take for granted that anybody at that level has "cheated"
on their spouse; power is the ultimate aphrodisiac. The cases we
actually *hear* about are a tiny portion of the cases that occur, and
are randomly selected.

Besides, we have no idea what his actual deal with his wife was; so
far as I'm concerned she's the only one with standing to complain of
his behavior.

Comments.

There are a few.

I notice you've had nothing to say about the fraud Halliburton and
Dick Cheney have been profiting from, and the long string of lies out
of the White House to get us into this war, and the deliberate
"outing" of an undercover CIA operative to punish her husband for
writing a report critical of the administration's position (the
"yellowcake" scandal). Or his brother's illegally purging black
voters from the rolls in Florida to get Bush elected in the first
place. Frankly the crimes of this administration take us back to
19th-century levels, or perhaps to third-world hellhole levels.

("R. Hubbell" wrote)
Looks like you're new to usenet. Don't get too worked up. I hope you
don't plonk everyone you disagree with. But then again I guess that's
the republican way. So little tolerance for opposing or alternate views.


I don't have a horse, a donkey, or an elephant in this fight but......

It's my observation that a person will be labeled intolerant, unless they
(whole-heartedly) swallow whatever "alternative" viewpoints the left is
sponsoring.

Big John, please consider *unplonking* David ...for the holidays g

--
Montblack
http://lumma.de/mt/archives/bart.gif

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 22:41:29 -0600 "Montblack" wrote:

("R. Hubbell" wrote)
Looks like you're new to usenet. Don't get too worked up. I hope you
don't plonk everyone you disagree with. But then again I guess that's
the republican way. So little tolerance for opposing or alternate views.


I don't have a horse, a donkey, or an elephant in this fight but......

You can't expect us to believe that!


It's my observation that a person will be labeled intolerant, unless they
(whole-heartedly) swallow whatever "alternative" viewpoints the left is
sponsoring.

No "swallowing" involved as you can see from the definition for tolerance:

"sympathy or indulgence for beliefs or practices differing from or
conflicting with one's own"


It's another step toward enlightenment to understand opposition.



Big John, please consider *unplonking* David ...for the holidays g

Now that's a good idea! This is supposed to be a place for discourse.
A little decorum would do us all good, if only for the holidays. Make
better humans of us all. Maybe even throw in a dash of humility to
round things out.


R. Hubbell


--
Montblack
http://lumma.de/mt/archives/bart.gif

Montblack

Guess I missused the term.

I had planned on gracefully (ungracefully) backing out of
participation in the thresd and hoping that some the views expressed
did kill someone who believed and acted on them.

Thanks for your rational comment.

Big John

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 22:41:29 -0600, "Montblack"
wrote:

("R. Hubbell" wrote)
Looks like you're new to usenet. Don't get too worked up. I hope you
don't plonk everyone you disagree with. But then again I guess that's
the republican way. So little tolerance for opposing or alternate views.


I don't have a horse, a donkey, or an elephant in this fight but......

It's my observation that a person will be labeled intolerant, unless they
(whole-heartedly) swallow whatever "alternative" viewpoints the left is
sponsoring.

Big John, please consider *unplonking* David ...for the holidays g

R Hubbell

Oh, I've been around for a little while.

As I said in post. "I just don't suffer fools".

I just let them rant on.

Big John


On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:45:57 -0800, "R. Hubbell"
wrote:

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 16:37:13 -0600 Big John wrote:

David

David. Once more. I just don't suffer fools and sleep soundly.

You Texas 'Two Step' around the original post and now instead of
acknowledging the short combings of the last Democratic
administration, you blow hot air and try to overwhelm all with Crap.

Take your last shot. You've got GW for five more years so drop your
pants, bend over and joy it.

Big John

gone----------------------------------------
*
*
*
plonk

Looks like you're new to usenet. Don't get too worked up. I hope you
don't plonk everyone you disagree with. But then again I guess that's
the republican way. So little tolerance for opposing or alternate views.


R. Hubbell




On 03 Dec 2003 22:59:11 -0600, David Dyer-Bennet
wrote:

Big John writes:

David

You didn't directly address my "lie, steal and cheat".
`````````````````````````````````````````````````` ```````````````````````````````
Stood up on TV and admitted to the world that he "lied".

More than any other president has done. He seems to actually value
integrity.

Stole furniture from White House when he left and had to return it
(WSJ and other sources)

Widely debunked.

Cheated on Hillery (admitted on TV)

Big deal. I take for granted that anybody at that level has "cheated"
on their spouse; power is the ultimate aphrodisiac. The cases we
actually *hear* about are a tiny portion of the cases that occur, and
are randomly selected.

Besides, we have no idea what his actual deal with his wife was; so
far as I'm concerned she's the only one with standing to complain of
his behavior.

Comments.

There are a few.

I notice you've had nothing to say about the fraud Halliburton and
Dick Cheney have been profiting from, and the long string of lies out
of the White House to get us into this war, and the deliberate
"outing" of an undercover CIA operative to punish her husband for
writing a report critical of the administration's position (the
"yellowcake" scandal). Or his brother's illegally purging black
voters from the rolls in Florida to get Bush elected in the first
place. Frankly the crimes of this administration take us back to
19th-century levels, or perhaps to third-world hellhole levels.

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:42:45 -0600 Big John wrote:

R Hubbell

Oh, I've been around for a little while.

As I said in post. "I just don't suffer fools".

I just let them rant on.

Agreed, me too. If the shoe fits wear it.


R. Hubbell


Big John


On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:45:57 -0800, "R. Hubbell"
wrote:

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 16:37:13 -0600 Big John wrote:

David

David. Once more. I just don't suffer fools and sleep soundly.

You Texas 'Two Step' around the original post and now instead of
acknowledging the short combings of the last Democratic
administration, you blow hot air and try to overwhelm all with Crap.

Take your last shot. You've got GW for five more years so drop your
pants, bend over and joy it.

Big John

gone----------------------------------------
*
*
*
plonk

Looks like you're new to usenet. Don't get too worked up. I hope you
don't plonk everyone you disagree with. But then again I guess that's
the republican way. So little tolerance for opposing or alternate views.


R. Hubbell




On 03 Dec 2003 22:59:11 -0600, David Dyer-Bennet
wrote:

Big John writes:

David

You didn't directly address my "lie, steal and cheat".
`````````````````````````````````````````````````` ```````````````````````````````
Stood up on TV and admitted to the world that he "lied".

More than any other president has done. He seems to actually value
integrity.

Stole furniture from White House when he left and had to return it
(WSJ and other sources)

Widely debunked.

Cheated on Hillery (admitted on TV)

Big deal. I take for granted that anybody at that level has "cheated"
on their spouse; power is the ultimate aphrodisiac. The cases we
actually *hear* about are a tiny portion of the cases that occur, and
are randomly selected.

Besides, we have no idea what his actual deal with his wife was; so
far as I'm concerned she's the only one with standing to complain of
his behavior.

Comments.

There are a few.

I notice you've had nothing to say about the fraud Halliburton and
Dick Cheney have been profiting from, and the long string of lies out
of the White House to get us into this war, and the deliberate
"outing" of an undercover CIA operative to punish her husband for
writing a report critical of the administration's position (the
"yellowcake" scandal). Or his brother's illegally purging black
voters from the rolls in Florida to get Bush elected in the first
place. Frankly the crimes of this administration take us back to
19th-century levels, or perhaps to third-world hellhole levels.

In article , David Dyer-Bennet
wrote:

Stood up on TV and admitted to the world that he "lied".

More than any other president has done. He seems to actually value
integrity.

wow! That is pretty close to the dumbest thing I've read on
usenet.

--
Bob Noel

Then you haven't been paying attention.

mike regish

"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
In article , David Dyer-Bennet
wrote:

Stood up on TV and admitted to the world that he "lied".

More than any other president has done. He seems to actually value
integrity.

wow! That is pretty close to the dumbest thing I've read on
usenet.

--
Bob Noel