A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Big Kahunas



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 3rd 03, 01:46 PM
Wdtabor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article 4Dgzb.18976$ZE1.4996@fed1read04, "R. Hubbell"
writes:

On 02 Dec 2003 17:37:42 GMT ackatyu (Wdtabor) wrote:

In article 0w3zb.17525$ZE1.2305@fed1read04, "R. Hubbell"
writes:


I've always like usenet for the great humor! Rice! Good one. She's just
not qualified in so many ways.


Imagine if a Republican said something like that about a black woman.



Ok, I'm imagining, now what? Do you honestly believe this country will
elect a woman as president soon? I think we have a ways to go before that
happens.


We'll see. The Republicans I know are certainly ready and Rice has strong
support among them for 2008. Whether the Democrats are ready to lay aside their
sexual and racial prejudices or not, I do not know.


She is a US born citizen over 35 years old. So, the Constitution says she

is
qualified if she can get the votes in the Electoral College.

She is brilliant, has extensive foriegn policy experience, a well rounded
education, and impecable character. She is even a concert pianist.


Her foreign policy experience is to tryo fix things her boss breaks.

She really isn't brilliant. But if you have evidence to counter that let
us see and judge for ourself.


Let's see, a PhD when she was 20 might lend some support to the contention.

Not sure what the piano will do for her quest for the office. Maybe you can
explain that too.


A saxophone seemed to help Clinton.

Now if you ask anyone in Israel they will tell you she's the best.


What qualifications do you require? That she look more like Carol Mosley

Braun?

Who?


Intentionally Nazified spelling of one of the Dwarves running for the Dem
nomination. The racist one.


OF course, for me, her greatest qualifiaction is that Democrats are scared
sh*tless of her.


I didn't know that either, can you explain the evidence for that?


The attempts even 5 years ahead of time to denegrate her accomplishments and
intellect by the Dems and the media are certain indicators of the terror she
strikes in their hearts.

--
Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS
PP-ASEL
Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG
  #2  
Old December 3rd 03, 10:32 PM
R. Hubbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 03 Dec 2003 13:46:39 GMT ackatyu (Wdtabor) wrote:

In article 4Dgzb.18976$ZE1.4996@fed1read04, "R. Hubbell"
writes:

On 02 Dec 2003 17:37:42 GMT
ackatyu (Wdtabor) wrote:

In article 0w3zb.17525$ZE1.2305@fed1read04, "R. Hubbell"
writes:


I've always like usenet for the great humor! Rice! Good one. She's just
not qualified in so many ways.

Imagine if a Republican said something like that about a black woman.



Ok, I'm imagining, now what? Do you honestly believe this country will
elect a woman as president soon? I think we have a ways to go before that
happens.


We'll see. The Republicans I know are certainly ready and Rice has strong
support among them for 2008. Whether the Democrats are ready to lay aside their
sexual and racial prejudices or not, I do not know.


What do the democrats have to do with Rice running?



She is a US born citizen over 35 years old. So, the Constitution says she

is
qualified if she can get the votes in the Electoral College.

She is brilliant, has extensive foriegn policy experience, a well rounded
education, and impecable character. She is even a concert pianist.


Her foreign policy experience is to tryo fix things her boss breaks.

She really isn't brilliant. But if you have evidence to counter that let
us see and judge for ourself.


Let's see, a PhD when she was 20 might lend some support to the contention.



That's not proof of brilliance for me. I've heard from people at Stanford
that she isn't real impressive. An oppurtunist that has gotten by on
affirmative action at every chance.




Not sure what the piano will do for her quest for the office. Maybe you can
explain that too.


A saxophone seemed to help Clinton.


You've lost me on this one....


Now if you ask anyone in Israel they will tell you she's the best.


What qualifications do you require? That she look more like Carol Mosley

Braun?

Who?


Intentionally Nazified spelling of one of the Dwarves running for the Dem
nomination. The racist one.



Whatever you say. german words == nazi words??




OF course, for me, her greatest qualifiaction is that Democrats are scared
sh*tless of her.


I didn't know that either, can you explain the evidence for that?


The attempts even 5 years ahead of time to denegrate her accomplishments and
intellect by the Dems and the media are certain indicators of the terror she
strikes in their hearts.



I think they're just pointing out the facts. But whatever shoe fits, wear.


R. Hubbell




--
Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS
PP-ASEL
Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.