Big Kahunas

("R. Hubbell" wrote)
Looks like you're new to usenet. Don't get too worked up. I hope you
don't plonk everyone you disagree with. But then again I guess that's
the republican way. So little tolerance for opposing or alternate views.


I don't have a horse, a donkey, or an elephant in this fight but......

It's my observation that a person will be labeled intolerant, unless they
(whole-heartedly) swallow whatever "alternative" viewpoints the left is
sponsoring.

Big John, please consider *unplonking* David ...for the holidays g

--
Montblack
http://lumma.de/mt/archives/bart.gif

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 22:41:29 -0600 "Montblack" wrote:

("R. Hubbell" wrote)
Looks like you're new to usenet. Don't get too worked up. I hope you
don't plonk everyone you disagree with. But then again I guess that's
the republican way. So little tolerance for opposing or alternate views.


I don't have a horse, a donkey, or an elephant in this fight but......

You can't expect us to believe that!


It's my observation that a person will be labeled intolerant, unless they
(whole-heartedly) swallow whatever "alternative" viewpoints the left is
sponsoring.

No "swallowing" involved as you can see from the definition for tolerance:

"sympathy or indulgence for beliefs or practices differing from or
conflicting with one's own"


It's another step toward enlightenment to understand opposition.



Big John, please consider *unplonking* David ...for the holidays g

Now that's a good idea! This is supposed to be a place for discourse.
A little decorum would do us all good, if only for the holidays. Make
better humans of us all. Maybe even throw in a dash of humility to
round things out.


R. Hubbell


--
Montblack
http://lumma.de/mt/archives/bart.gif

Montblack

Guess I missused the term.

I had planned on gracefully (ungracefully) backing out of
participation in the thresd and hoping that some the views expressed
did kill someone who believed and acted on them.

Thanks for your rational comment.

Big John

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 22:41:29 -0600, "Montblack"
wrote:

("R. Hubbell" wrote)
Looks like you're new to usenet. Don't get too worked up. I hope you
don't plonk everyone you disagree with. But then again I guess that's
the republican way. So little tolerance for opposing or alternate views.


I don't have a horse, a donkey, or an elephant in this fight but......

It's my observation that a person will be labeled intolerant, unless they
(whole-heartedly) swallow whatever "alternative" viewpoints the left is
sponsoring.

Big John, please consider *unplonking* David ...for the holidays g

Dam dead nerves in fingers ( Little or no sense of feel.

I of course mean't to say "didn't kill someone" vs the way it came out
as "did kill someone".

Big John


On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:50:53 -0600, Big John
wrote:

Montblack

Guess I missused the term.

I had planned on gracefully (ungracefully) backing out of
participation in the thresd and hoping that some the views expressed
did kill someone who believed and acted on them.

Thanks for your rational comment.

Big John

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 22:41:29 -0600, "Montblack"
wrote:

("R. Hubbell" wrote)
Looks like you're new to usenet. Don't get too worked up. I hope you
don't plonk everyone you disagree with. But then again I guess that's
the republican way. So little tolerance for opposing or alternate views.


I don't have a horse, a donkey, or an elephant in this fight but......

It's my observation that a person will be labeled intolerant, unless they
(whole-heartedly) swallow whatever "alternative" viewpoints the left is
sponsoring.

Big John, please consider *unplonking* David ...for the holidays g