![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For most VFR flights of significant length I plan carefully, especially since I
like to fly very low. I draw the lines on the sectionals, checking for special use airspace, obstacles such as towers, landmarks, frequencies of interest (ATIS and CTAF of nearby airports and navaids). I plan waypoints and calculate time and distance, course and heading, and make note on my form of the maximum obstacle altitudes along my route or quadrant as appropriate. I also put my destiation frequences, runway designations, and altitudes and TPA up at the top. In flight, having all this info readily available is very convenient and helps keep track of where I am. I don't pay much attention to the GPS... at least I try not to. Lean on it too much and one day you'll realize you've become a passenger rather than a pilot. I use pilotage as my primary navigation when VFR. IFR I plan the route based on Victor airways, and then throw it all out upon getting my clearance. I throw the clearance out when I get reroutes in flight. However the planning does help me cope with reroutes because it helps me find the new routing on the chart. I am capable of just picking up and going, but I prefer to have the flight planned ahead of time. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For most VFR flights of significant length I plan carefully, especially
since I like to fly very low. This is an interesting statement that begs for an explanation. Why do you like to fly "very low"? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article vQRAb.459661$Tr4.1277818@attbi_s03,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: For most VFR flights of significant length I plan carefully, especially since I like to fly very low. This is an interesting statement that begs for an explanation. Why do you like to fly "very low"? I was about to ask the same question. Scared of heights? ![]() A burning desire to knock those branches out of the landing gear? ![]() -- Tony Roberts PP-ASEL VFR OTT Night Almost Instrument ![]() Cessna 172H C-GICE |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why do you like to fly "very low"?
It's pretty. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() This is an interesting statement that begs for an explanation. Why do you like to fly "very low"? Gosh, doesn't everyone? My primary reason for flying at 2900 feet AGL (if you consider that low--I do!) is that it frees me from having to think about airways while getting me above the controlled airspace near my home. I almost never go higher, and I am so accustomed to this altitude that I feel a bit uncomfortable flying lower, though I will do so if there's a strong headwind. There aren't many pastures where I fly, and I like the extra gliding distance. The view is great from 2900 feet. If the poster means that he likes to smell the newmown hay--well, that's another matter. all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
2900 Feet AGL is Low???? Just kidding. Army helicopters, if anything other
than the rotors are above the trees, your too high. But when I fly PP-ASEL anywhere, I get up there. There is nothing like altitude. What is that saying? Two things that are useless, Fuel on the ground and air above you? Fred "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... This is an interesting statement that begs for an explanation. Why do you like to fly "very low"? Gosh, doesn't everyone? My primary reason for flying at 2900 feet AGL (if you consider that low--I do!) is that it frees me from having to think about airways while getting me above the controlled airspace near my home. I almost never go higher, and I am so accustomed to this altitude that I feel a bit uncomfortable flying lower, though I will do so if there's a strong headwind. There aren't many pastures where I fly, and I like the extra gliding distance. The view is great from 2900 feet. If the poster means that he likes to smell the newmown hay--well, that's another matter. all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My primary reason for flying at 2900 feet AGL (if you consider that
low--I do!) is that it frees me from having to think about airways I was presuming he meant lower than 2900 AGL. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
My primary reason for flying at 2900 feet AGL (if you consider that low--I do!) is that it frees me from having to think about airways I was presuming he meant lower than 2900 AGL. I almost never fly higher than 2000 AGL, and spend most of my time at 1500. I got into that habit when I spent most of my time flying below the Washington class B's 1500 foot veil. Now, even on the Eastern Shore of Maryland and Delaware, I still fly at 1500' most of the time. I like looking at stuff on the ground. :-) -- Jay __!__ Jay and Teresa Masino ___(_)___ http://www2.ari.net/jmasino/ ! ! ! Checkout http://www.oc-adolfos.com/ for the best Italian food in Ocean City, MD and... Checkout http://www.brolow.com/ for authentic Blues music on Delmarva |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, Cub Driver said:
My primary reason for flying at 2900 feet AGL (if you consider that low--I do!) is that it frees me from having to think about airways while getting me above the controlled airspace near my home. The problem with flight below 3,000 AGL is you keep encountering other aircraft. Every time I'm down there, I feel like I'm a World War II fighter pilot over Germany, because there's always somebody whizzing past in one direction or another, and if I stop scanning the skies for even a second in order to sight see, I'm going to get killed. I like to cruise between 6,000 and 10,000 - there's NOBODY up there. I flew for five hours yesterday, and the only traffic pointed out by ATC was down in the weeds, and I saw a few Dash-8s climbing or descending through my altitude, but otherwise it was pure bliss with the world stretching out as far as the eye could see in all directions. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ It's fun to mock old people. They're going to die soon anyway. -- Mike Sphar |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like to cruise between 6,000 and 10,000 - there's NOBODY up there.
I go for the mid-latitudes, between 4500 and 6500. Well above the patterns (in the MidWest), and well below the big boys. My O-540 loves that altitude range as well. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
IFR flight plan filing question | Tune2828 | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | July 23rd 03 03:33 AM |