![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It was derived from the numbers of illegals that apply for services divided by high/low estimates from INS. I don't remember the exact source, but it came out in May, 2001. AAMOF, my M-I-L, who is 88, has voted in every election since 1936, after coming over from Scotland when she was nine yers old, and has NEVER become a US citizen (as she's now finding out the hard way as she applies for assisted living for seniors). Until you have a reference and data it's supposition and unproven. It's a pretty far stretch from applying for services to voting. Well, then let's talk about the flawed voter roll purges that occured in both Texas and Florida. http://dir.salon.com/politics/featur...ile/index.html Really credible source, Salon is. Ok here are more references. http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/3594763.htm http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer http://www.examiner.com/opinion/defa...editorial0522w The argument is AMERICANS...and that implies ONCE, LIVING, NOT A FELON... A felony conviction does not permenantly remove your right to vote. If it were I'm sure Admiral Poindexter would be very disappointed. If you read the article you would see that it's not just an issue with felons, it's also just the plain sloppy job the company did, capturing people who had no conviction. Their selection algorithm was just plain flawed. I remember that in the first hours of the election returns Bush had a 54-46% lead over Gore (at about the 35-45% of votes cast). Considering that rural areas, Bush's strong points, are LATER in getting their numbers in, something funky happened. Again, just conjecture. They never did look into the counties that had HUGH turnouts by dead people, Data please. including several counties that Gore won that were very typical Bush territory Not inconceivable. even more votes cast than people living there (New York and Penn.). Live in one county, work and vote in another. References? --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.550 / Virus Database: 342 - Release Date: 12/9/2003 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Carl Ellis wrote: Live in one county, work and vote in another. Everywhere I've lived, that was illegal. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Carl Ellis wrote: Live in one county, work and vote in another. Everywhere I've lived, that was illegal. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." The working or the voting 8-). I believe that in Oregon the out of district vote is treated like an absentee vote. It is put aside, then residency is verified, then the vote is counted. Of course you can't vote on local issues if you do this. But I am not 100% positive on this. - Carl - --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.550 / Virus Database: 342 - Release Date: 12/9/2003 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Carl Ellis" wrote in message ... "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Carl Ellis wrote: Live in one county, work and vote in another. Everywhere I've lived, that was illegal. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." The working or the voting 8-). I believe that in Oregon the out of district vote is treated like an absentee vote. It is put aside, then residency is verified, then the vote is counted. Of course you can't vote on local issues if you do this. But I am not 100% positive on this. - Carl - --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.550 / Virus Database: 342 - Release Date: 12/9/2003 Looks like it's possible in Oregon. There doesn't seem to be any rule for verifying the reason for the absence from your county of residence. In practice this looks like it it treated like a normal absentee ballot for which no justification is required either. http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/253.html 253.135 Special absent elector procedures. (1) An elector who, on the day of an election, will be absent from the county in which the elector is registered may vote at the elections office of any county clerk or at any polling site in this state. (2) An elector voting under this section shall complete and sign a voter registration card. (3) The elector shall insert the ballot into a small envelope provided by the election board and then shall insert the small envelope into a larger envelope. The larger envelope shall be deposited into the ballot box. (4) A ballot cast under this section shall be forwarded to the county clerk of the county in which the elector resides not later than the eighth day after the election. The ballot shall be counted in the county in which the elector resides if the elector is qualified to vote in that county. A vote shall be counted only if the elector is qualified to vote for the particular office or on the measure. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.550 / Virus Database: 342 - Release Date: 12/9/2003 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|