|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
December 17th 03, 03:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Why doesn't he fly in with a flight of Fighter Escorts and no TFR?
Could be safer than alone in a TFR due to reaction time of close Fighters if anything were about to happen. Doesn't take a Rocket Scientist to make things work. Big John On 15 Dec 2003 07:35:39 -0800, (Gene Seibel) wrote: The Wright Flyer not being able to take off may have nothing to do with the TFR.  
|
|
#2
December 17th 03, 05:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Actually, I'd like to see the prez shut down Oshkosh by visiting. It's
probably the only way enough outrage will be generated to overcome the silly TFR thing once and for all. If the pres makes "an exception", the whole TFR thing will be seen as reasonable. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Centenial of Flight at MOF (Seattle) | Jack G | Military Aviation | 0 | December 2nd 03 11:59 PM |
Hybrid Mode
