![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AOPA Press Release
Light planes a security benefit, not a risk. Aircraft Owners and pilots Association (AOPA) President, Ron Lawford, today called for an end to the security 'scam' and unecessary costs to the community. "The Department of transport has initiated some expensive measures in the name of security, expensive bi-annual police checks for all pilots, but openly admits there is no actual danger and that this is purely to counter a public perception" said Mr lawford. "A lack of Government direction and haphazard regulation has hurt General Aviation over the last Decade, the last thing we need now is expensive perception management" Mr Lawford said AOPA had written to the Minister offering to organise an 'Airport Watch' whereby aircraft owners and pilots all over Australia took on a voluntary security role. "Imagine the benefit to Australia if all General Aviation pilots were on the lookout for questionable activity, in the air or on the ground, sort of a free air patrol with 6000 aircraft and 30,000 officers! "We will oppose this unnecessary impost for no real value while offering the Government a real and viable alternative with definite benefits" Mr Lawford said. "Phil" philatwotechdotcomdotau wrote in message ... Sounds to me like an attempt by CASA to purge the system of inactive pilots who are presently hanging on to their licences in the hope that one day they will be able to afford to get back into it. If CASA achieves that goal they will save quite a lot on printing and postage. But I wonder how this new background information is to be used. I haven't seen any mention of acceptance criteria or rejection criteria. Will pilots who don't come up to some unpublished standard be barred from holding a pilot licence? If not, then what is the information to be used for? And why should we pay for it? And as somebody else suggested, why shouldn't the same rules apply to truck drivers and car drivers. And what about all those pedestrians, who have been a major source of terror attacks in Israel. The whole exercise might be nothing more than a political stunt to win more votes from an ignorant public. Phil Maley |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
MSNBC Reporting on GA Security Threat | Scott Schluer | Piloting | 44 | November 23rd 03 02:50 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
"Enhanced Security" at various airports.... | Dr. Anthony J. Lomenzo | Piloting | 35 | August 17th 03 03:46 PM |