![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 235 was never going to sell as well as the 182 or
206 anyway which both have significant utility advantages operating off-airport and short field. Well, that's somewhat debatable. If you're talking about landing in wagon-rutted fields with three-foot hedges on either side, you're right -- the 182's high wing and steel gear will beat the low wing aircraft, hand's down. However, it's kind of the aviation version of SUV marketing: Sure, a Hummer can climb a 60 degree slope, but who really cares? 99.995% of the population will drive it to the store. Bottom line: I fly the Pathfinder in and out of grass strips that would challenge a lesser plane. That's as "off-road" as I care to get. Heck, that's MORE "off-road" than most pilots I know *ever* get. (D'ja ever take your MU-2 into Amana? :-) Sure they could have sold more *if* the price was unchanged, but what if it cost $10,000 more? As I understand it, the 235 was already priced higher than the 182 back in '74 -- so the chances of Piper coming in with it under-priced were unlikely. Still, Piper sold enough 235s and 236s to make them a profitable line, and the second door would only have helped sales. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:IA1Gb.640175$Fm2.571783@attbi_s04... The 235 was never going to sell as well as the 182 or 206 anyway which both have significant utility advantages operating off-airport and short field. Well, that's somewhat debatable. If you're talking about landing in wagon-rutted fields with three-foot hedges on either side, you're right -- the 182's high wing and steel gear will beat the low wing aircraft, hand's down. However, it's kind of the aviation version of SUV marketing: Sure, a Hummer can climb a 60 degree slope, but who really cares? 99.995% of the population will drive it to the store. Agreed but if a Hummer only costs a little more (and had no other drawbacks) then everybody will buy it instead of the other SUVs which will only climb a 40 deg slope Bottom line: I fly the Pathfinder in and out of grass strips that would challenge a lesser plane. That's as "off-road" as I care to get. Heck, that's MORE "off-road" than most pilots I know *ever* get. (D'ja ever take your MU-2 into Amana? :-) I have flown into a lot shorter and rougher fields than that! Do they have cheap fuel? Sure they could have sold more *if* the price was unchanged, but what if it cost $10,000 more? As I understand it, the 235 was already priced higher than the 182 back in '74 -- so the chances of Piper coming in with it under-priced were unlikely. So would anyone have bought them if they were $10,000 more? We will never know. Piper evidently thought that it wasn't worth it. Still, Piper sold enough 235s and 236s to make them a profitable line, and the second door would only have helped sales. Again it would have helped sales at the same price but there is a limit to how much people will pay for a feature. Saying that it is obvious that adding another door would have helped Piper is to assume that the company was inept.and they didn't know what their customers wanted. Mike MU-2 -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|