![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wanna bet your life that they wouldn't miss? I wouldn't. I'd rather deal
with the terrorist. Since the Dept. of Homeland Insecurity seems to think that the terrorist are likely trained ATP's how will the Air Marshal stop them when they are locked behind that now reinforced, bullet proof cockpit door? If the threat is supposed to be an intercontinental flight hijacked and crashed into Vegas enroute to LAX, Why is the Vegas airspace only closed to GA and charters? The alert seems to be another bunch of no common sense, knee jerk reactions -- Kevin McCue KRYN '47 Luscombe 8E Rans S-17 (for sale) -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kevin McCue" wrote in message ... Wanna bet your life that they wouldn't miss? I wouldn't. I'd rather deal with the terrorist. Then you are a fool. Since the Dept. of Homeland Insecurity seems to think that the terrorist are likely trained ATP's how will the Air Marshal stop them when they are locked behind that now reinforced, bullet proof cockpit door? Why do you believe the DHS thinks terrorists are likely trained ATP's? How could the terrorists become locked behind that now reinforced, bullet proof cockpit door? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because the DHS said they are likely trained airline pilots. They would
be behind the door because they were incontrol of the flight since take off as the crew. -- Kevin McCue KRYN '47 Luscombe 8E Rans S-17 (for sale) -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kevin McCue" wrote in message ... Because the DHS said they are likely trained airline pilots. They would be behind the door because they were incontrol of the flight since take off as the crew. The DHS said foreign air carriers are hiring or have hired terrorists? Why don't they just alert the air carriers? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kevin McCue" wrote in message ... Wanna bet your life that they wouldn't miss? I wouldn't. I'd rather deal with the terrorist. Since the Dept. of Homeland Insecurity seems to think that the terrorist are likely trained ATP's how will the Air Marshal stop them when they are locked behind that now reinforced, bullet proof cockpit door? Most ailiners don't have them yet. If the threat is supposed to be an intercontinental flight hijacked and crashed into Vegas enroute to LAX, Why is the Vegas airspace only closed to GA and charters? Ask Tom Ridge. The alert seems to be another bunch of no common sense, knee jerk reactions Seems to be, but then, you don't have access to all the information, do you? BTW: There's a new collision avoidance system coming that will make 9-11 type attacks harder. Won't keep them from blowing up a plane full of fuel and raining fire on a target below though. -*MORT*- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:37:33 -0700, "Kevin McCue"
wrote: Wanna bet your life that they wouldn't miss? I wouldn't. I'd rather deal with the terrorist. Since the Dept. of Homeland Insecurity seems to think that the terrorist are likely trained ATP's how will the Air Marshal stop them when they are locked behind that now reinforced, bullet proof cockpit door? The only way a terrorist could get behind that locked, bullet proof door is for someone to open it. The British pliots (or rather, their union) seem to think that having the pilots open that door is a really good idea. -- Bill Funk replace "g" with "a" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Funk wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:37:33 -0700, "Kevin McCue" wrote: Wanna bet your life that they wouldn't miss? I wouldn't. I'd rather deal with the terrorist. Since the Dept. of Homeland Insecurity seems to think that the terrorist are likely trained ATP's how will the Air Marshal stop them when they are locked behind that now reinforced, bullet proof cockpit door? The only way a terrorist could get behind that locked, bullet proof door is for someone to open it. The British pliots (or rather, their union) seem to think that having the pilots open that door is a really good idea. "Candy-gram" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Funk" wrote in message news ![]() On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:37:33 -0700, "Kevin McCue" wrote: Wanna bet your life that they wouldn't miss? I wouldn't. I'd rather deal with the terrorist. Since the Dept. of Homeland Insecurity seems to think that the terrorist are likely trained ATP's how will the Air Marshal stop them when they are locked behind that now reinforced, bullet proof cockpit door? The only way a terrorist could get behind that locked, bullet proof door is for someone to open it. The British pliots (or rather, their union) seem to think that having the pilots open that door is a really good idea. Right, which is why it was managed to be opened by a couple of people armed with nothing more than a drink cart. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 15:08:13 GMT, "Scout"
wrote: "Bill Funk" wrote in message news ![]() On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:37:33 -0700, "Kevin McCue" wrote: Wanna bet your life that they wouldn't miss? I wouldn't. I'd rather deal with the terrorist. Since the Dept. of Homeland Insecurity seems to think that the terrorist are likely trained ATP's how will the Air Marshal stop them when they are locked behind that now reinforced, bullet proof cockpit door? The only way a terrorist could get behind that locked, bullet proof door is for someone to open it. The British pliots (or rather, their union) seem to think that having the pilots open that door is a really good idea. Right, which is why it was managed to be opened by a couple of people armed with nothing more than a drink cart. How did they open a locked bullet proof door with a drink cart? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() " Bogart " wrote in message s.com... On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 15:08:13 GMT, "Scout" wrote: "Bill Funk" wrote in message news ![]() On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:37:33 -0700, "Kevin McCue" wrote: Wanna bet your life that they wouldn't miss? I wouldn't. I'd rather deal with the terrorist. Since the Dept. of Homeland Insecurity seems to think that the terrorist are likely trained ATP's how will the Air Marshal stop them when they are locked behind that now reinforced, bullet proof cockpit door? The only way a terrorist could get behind that locked, bullet proof door is for someone to open it. The British pliots (or rather, their union) seem to think that having the pilots open that door is a really good idea. Right, which is why it was managed to be opened by a couple of people armed with nothing more than a drink cart. How did they open a locked bullet proof door with a drink cart? They rammed the door with it. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |