A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

1 watt and 5 watt LED for Nav lights?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 16th 04, 05:23 PM
Jim Weir
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm not sure anybody really "knows". We've seen some subjective comments like
"boy they are really bright" and "gee, they sure are green", but I do not
believe anybody has quantitative data as to whether the actual FAR optical
specification has been met.

OTOH, I've seen some comments in here about the FAR specification being so
loosey-goosey that two birthday candles inside a wine bottle strapped to the
wingtip would be OK.

As you say, I'd like to see some hard photometric data taken with calibrated
equipment and a checklist of HOW this particular installation meets the FAR.

Jim



(Bill)
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

-To Jim Weir and Group
-
-I am interested in using the new (to me) 1 watt and 5 watt LEDs for
-nav lights.



Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com
  #2  
Old April 16th 04, 07:21 PM
anonymous coward
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Weir wrote:

I'm not sure anybody really "knows". We've seen some subjective comments
like "boy they are really bright" and "gee, they sure are green", but I do
not believe anybody has quantitative data as to whether the actual FAR
optical specification has been met.

OTOH, I've seen some comments in here about the FAR specification being so
loosey-goosey that two birthday candles inside a wine bottle strapped to
the wingtip would be OK.

As you say, I'd like to see some hard photometric data taken with
calibrated equipment and a checklist of HOW this particular installation
meets the FAR.


I'm just browsing (i.e. not building a plane) so I haven't got the FAR
regulations to hand. But I've played with Luxeons quite a lot so this
piqued my interest. What exactly are the FAR requirements?

Luxeon provide some good photometric data on their LEDs on their website.
http://www.lumileds.com/products/doc...ion_index.html
They give peak wavelengths, CIE chromaticity co-ordinates,
spectrophotometric measurements, deviation with temperature, luminous
efficiency...

IIRC the red-orange 1w LED gives out 55 Lumens of light output - which is an
order of magnitude better than a filtered lightbulb. Other colours give out
considerably less light - but even the green LED will be more efficient
than a green-filtered xenon-flash tube, for example.

Then there's the matter of making sure the right amount of light goes in the
right directions.

AC

Jim



(Bill)
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

-To Jim Weir and Group
-
-I am interested in using the new (to me) 1 watt and 5 watt LEDs for
-nav lights.



Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com


  #3  
Old April 16th 04, 10:38 PM
Ernest Christley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

anonymous coward wrote:
Jim Weir wrote:


I'm not sure anybody really "knows". We've seen some subjective comments
like "boy they are really bright" and "gee, they sure are green", but I do
not believe anybody has quantitative data as to whether the actual FAR
optical specification has been met.

OTOH, I've seen some comments in here about the FAR specification being so
loosey-goosey that two birthday candles inside a wine bottle strapped to
the wingtip would be OK.

As you say, I'd like to see some hard photometric data taken with
calibrated equipment and a checklist of HOW this particular installation
meets the FAR.



I'm just browsing (i.e. not building a plane) so I haven't got the FAR
regulations to hand. But I've played with Luxeons quite a lot so this
piqued my interest. What exactly are the FAR requirements?

Luxeon provide some good photometric data on their LEDs on their website.
http://www.lumileds.com/products/doc...ion_index.html
They give peak wavelengths, CIE chromaticity co-ordinates,
spectrophotometric measurements, deviation with temperature, luminous
efficiency...

IIRC the red-orange 1w LED gives out 55 Lumens of light output - which is an
order of magnitude better than a filtered lightbulb. Other colours give out
considerably less light - but even the green LED will be more efficient
than a green-filtered xenon-flash tube, for example.

Then there's the matter of making sure the right amount of light goes in the
right directions.

AC

Jim



(Bill)
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

-To Jim Weir and Group
-
-I am interested in using the new (to me) 1 watt and 5 watt LEDs for
-nav lights.



Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com




The problem is that everyone uses a different yardstick to measure the
light output, and not all the yardsticks measure length.

Which would you rather have over your shop bench, one of those tiny LED
that are so bright you have to blink, or an 8ft flourescent that you can
stare at all day? Candles, watts, candella, lux, lumens...the terms go
on and on and what the FAA specifies may have more to do with
measurement convenience than they do safety. It's been a while, but the
FAA chose measurements that emphasize total light output, while all the
LED manufacturers use metrics that emphasize intensity.

Your tail light will cover the rear out to a 70* angle on each side, for
a 140* sweep. The marker light cover from directly ahead, back to the
70* mark.(Draw a circle and mark it off in 3 quadrants and you'll see
hwo this makes sense). Allmost all the ouput intensity is concentrated
on the level with it tapering to about 5% of the max at 85* up and down.
Note these are minimum values. More intensity is always a good thing.

I'm at work, but I'm thinking that it is all in FAR23-1490 (or within a
few paragraphs thereof).


--
http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/
"Ignorance is mankinds normal state,
alleviated by information and experience."
Veeduber
  #4  
Old April 17th 04, 06:22 AM
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Whelen is now selling LED nav lights.. green and red. I wonder if their
data (intensity, wavelenth) is readily available.. so they can show
proof of their compliance.

Dave

Ernest Christley wrote:
anonymous coward wrote:

Jim Weir wrote:


I'm not sure anybody really "knows". We've seen some subjective
comments
like "boy they are really bright" and "gee, they sure are green", but
I do
not believe anybody has quantitative data as to whether the actual FAR
optical specification has been met.

OTOH, I've seen some comments in here about the FAR specification
being so
loosey-goosey that two birthday candles inside a wine bottle strapped to
the wingtip would be OK.

As you say, I'd like to see some hard photometric data taken with
calibrated equipment and a checklist of HOW this particular installation
meets the FAR.




I'm just browsing (i.e. not building a plane) so I haven't got the FAR
regulations to hand. But I've played with Luxeons quite a lot so this
piqued my interest. What exactly are the FAR requirements?

Luxeon provide some good photometric data on their LEDs on their website.
http://www.lumileds.com/products/doc...ion_index.html
They give peak wavelengths, CIE chromaticity co-ordinates,
spectrophotometric measurements, deviation with temperature, luminous
efficiency...

IIRC the red-orange 1w LED gives out 55 Lumens of light output - which
is an
order of magnitude better than a filtered lightbulb. Other colours
give out
considerably less light - but even the green LED will be more efficient
than a green-filtered xenon-flash tube, for example.

Then there's the matter of making sure the right amount of light goes
in the
right directions.

AC

Jim



(Bill)
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

-To Jim Weir and Group
-
-I am interested in using the new (to me) 1 watt and 5 watt LEDs for
-nav lights.



Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com





The problem is that everyone uses a different yardstick to measure the
light output, and not all the yardsticks measure length.

Which would you rather have over your shop bench, one of those tiny LED
that are so bright you have to blink, or an 8ft flourescent that you can
stare at all day? Candles, watts, candella, lux, lumens...the terms go
on and on and what the FAA specifies may have more to do with
measurement convenience than they do safety. It's been a while, but the
FAA chose measurements that emphasize total light output, while all the
LED manufacturers use metrics that emphasize intensity.

Your tail light will cover the rear out to a 70* angle on each side, for
a 140* sweep. The marker light cover from directly ahead, back to the
70* mark.(Draw a circle and mark it off in 3 quadrants and you'll see
hwo this makes sense). Allmost all the ouput intensity is concentrated
on the level with it tapering to about 5% of the max at 85* up and down.
Note these are minimum values. More intensity is always a good thing.

I'm at work, but I'm thinking that it is all in FAR23-1490 (or within a
few paragraphs thereof).



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.