![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
news ![]() "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... You are allowed to enter the traffic pattern any way you like. Well, not just any way, there is a restriction on the direction of turns. Please explain to me how it is possible to "enter on a 45 to the downwind" AND "make all turns to the left in the traffic pattern" (that is paraphrased from memory). In fact, if one were to only make left turns in the traffic pattern, an overhead approach would be one of the ONLY ways to enter the pattern. Of course, one very few people are looking for. :-) -- Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike O'Malley wrote:
Please explain to me how it is possible to "enter on a 45 to the downwind" AND "make all turns to the left in the traffic pattern" (that is paraphrased from memory). In fact, if one were to only make left turns in the traffic pattern, an overhead approach would be one of the ONLY ways to enter the pattern. Of course, one very few people are looking for. :-) Am I misreading something, or do the Canadians frown on the "45 to downwind" approach at uncontrolled airports, (unless traffic advisory is available)??? http://www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/an...new197.htm#MF2 quote: Basically, when airport and traffic advisory information is not available, regardless of whether MF procedures are in effect or not, aircraft should not join 45% to the downwind leg, straight-in to the base or final leg of the circuit. The correct entry procedure to be used, therefore, depends on whether airport and traffic advisory is available or not." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mike O'Malley wrote: Please explain to me how it is possible to "enter on a 45 to the downwind" AND "make all turns to the left in the traffic pattern" (that is paraphrased from memory). The 45 entry to downwind is not "in the pattern". It is the entry to the pattern and does nopt have to be a left turn. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... The 45 entry to downwind is not "in the pattern". It is the entry to the pattern and does nopt have to be a left turn. The regulation does not require turns "in the pattern" to be to the left, it requires the pilot of an airplane approaching to land at an airport without an operating control tower to make all turns to the left. The 45 degree entry to downwind violates the regulation. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The 45 degree entry to downwind violates the regulation. Shall we arrest the FAA, then? all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... Shall we arrest the FAA, then? From a pilot's viewpoint, I do not see a downside to that. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote: The regulation does not require turns "in the pattern" to be to the left, it requires the pilot of an airplane approaching to land at an airport without an operating control tower to make all turns to the left. The 45 degree entry to downwind violates the regulation. While I'm inclined to agree with you that you have the better interpretation of that regulation, it's also clear that the FAA recommends a procedure that on its face seems to be illegal. If the FAA's recommendation is legal, then the logical reason must be that making the 45 right turn entry to the pattern occurs before the pilot is "approaching to land." It seems odd, given that the 45 entry is part of the defined pattern for the approach to landing, but I've seen the language in other FAR's strained farther than that. Todd Pattist (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) ___ Make a commitment to learn something from every flight. Share what you learn. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I read an NTSB decision that violated a 135 operator for turning a 5
mile final from a right base. If that is considered "approaching to land", then surely the 45 entry must be also. On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:45:34 -0500, Todd Pattist wrote: "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: The regulation does not require turns "in the pattern" to be to the left, it requires the pilot of an airplane approaching to land at an airport without an operating control tower to make all turns to the left. The 45 degree entry to downwind violates the regulation. While I'm inclined to agree with you that you have the better interpretation of that regulation, it's also clear that the FAA recommends a procedure that on its face seems to be illegal. If the FAA's recommendation is legal, then the logical reason must be that making the 45 right turn entry to the pattern occurs before the pilot is "approaching to land." It seems odd, given that the 45 entry is part of the defined pattern for the approach to landing, but I've seen the language in other FAR's strained farther than that. Todd Pattist (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) ___ Make a commitment to learn something from every flight. Share what you learn. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Zaleski wrote:
I read an NTSB decision that violated a 135 operator for turning a 5 mile final from a right base. If that is considered "approaching to land", then surely the 45 entry must be also. I read it too. It was his base to final turn. We're talking about a 45 entry turn that is 2 turns before the base to final turn. You tell me - is distance or number of turns more important? How about time? There must be some transition between "not yet approaching to land" and "approaching to land," but I don't think we can say that it's always illegal to make right hand turns within 5 miles of the airport you want to land at. Todd Pattist (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) ___ Make a commitment to learn something from every flight. Share what you learn. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Todd Pattist" wrote in message ... I read it too. It was his base to final turn. We're talking about a 45 entry turn that is 2 turns before the base to final turn. You tell me - is distance or number of turns more important? How about time? There must be some transition between "not yet approaching to land" and "approaching to land," but I don't think we can say that it's always illegal to make right hand turns within 5 miles of the airport you want to land at. The regulation says when approaching to land at an airport without an operating control tower each pilot of an airplane must make all turns of that airplane to the left. Logically, any turn made for the purpose of aligning the airplane with the landing runway is such a turn and must be made to the left. That would include all turns in the pattern and the pattern entry. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Front louvers for Cherokee/Archer overhead vents? | Bob Chilcoat | Owning | 10 | February 3rd 04 10:19 PM |
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime | John | Piloting | 5 | November 20th 03 09:40 PM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |