![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For those arriving on the non-pattern side of the runway its the best
way to do it. Its also important to do if the winds are unknown (because you can see the sock). The maneuver should be done above pattern altitude, with a long right turn (assuming left traffic) into the 45. The overhead entry "should" always drop you into the 45. "Harry Shin" wrote in message ... Hi Guys, My father and I were returning to Petaluma (O69), called in on the 45 to downwind and were just about to turn downwind when a flight of three experimentals called in that they were set up for their "overhead entry". They were flying above pattern altitude on the runway heading, proceeded to make a diving 180 turn to downwind, inside our line. Two of them jumped ahead of us, while the third resigned himself to following our Citabria. I guess we really messed up their spectacular approach and possible formation landing... (yawn) So, I'm wondering if their overhead approach to an un-controlled field is "approved"? Petaluma can get pretty busy on weekends, and I feel their grandstanding lead to some concern and un-necessary avoidance manuevering... Harry Shin Citabria N5064K, Sonerai I 'a building |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message m... For those arriving on the non-pattern side of the runway its the best way to do it. Its also important to do if the winds are unknown (because you can see the sock). The maneuver should be done above pattern altitude, with a long right turn (assuming left traffic) into the 45. The overhead entry "should" always drop you into the 45. That's not the typical overhead entry. The overhead entry is an upwind leg with a 180 degree left turn (assuming left hand traffic) to the downwind leg. "Harry Shin" wrote in message ... Hi Guys, My father and I were returning to Petaluma (O69), called in on the 45 to downwind and were just about to turn downwind when a flight of three experimentals called in that they were set up for their "overhead entry". They were flying above pattern altitude on the runway heading, proceeded to make a diving 180 turn to downwind, inside our line. Two of them jumped ahead of us, while the third resigned himself to following our Citabria. I guess we really messed up their spectacular approach and possible formation landing... (yawn) So, I'm wondering if their overhead approach to an un-controlled field is "approved"? Petaluma can get pretty busy on weekends, and I feel their grandstanding lead to some concern and un-necessary avoidance manuevering... Harry Shin Citabria N5064K, Sonerai I 'a building |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Front louvers for Cherokee/Archer overhead vents? | Bob Chilcoat | Owning | 10 | February 3rd 04 10:19 PM |
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime | John | Piloting | 5 | November 20th 03 09:40 PM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |