![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message news ![]() Are you jealous that others have practiced and enjoy flying formation? Is it "airplane envy"? Your second paragraph indicates an attitude problem. Orval, Hmmm. By your own analysis, these "others have practiced and enjoy flying formation" did a lousy job, so I'm certainly not jealous of them. As far as "airplane envy" and my so-called "attitude problem", I guess I should feel honored that these guys chose to create an un-necessary situation, with my father and I trying desperately to see where they were going, and trying to make sure the two in the low wing planes didn't nail us. With respect to my "attitude problem", I suppose it's just a case where it seems some people take themselves Way Too Seriously. "White flight", ten second landing intervals, "break now!"; you guys should join the Boy Scouts so you can practice marching in step (turns can be very difficult). I've also heard it's fun to wear camoflauge to play paintball... (oops, there's that damn attitude thing again! sorry...) Roger Out!, Harry |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Shin" wrote in message ... "Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message news ![]() Are you jealous that others have practiced and enjoy flying formation? Is it "airplane envy"? Your second paragraph indicates an attitude problem. Orval, Hmmm. By your own analysis, these "others have practiced and enjoy flying formation" did a lousy job, so I'm certainly not jealous of them. As far as "airplane envy" and my so-called "attitude problem", I guess I should feel honored that these guys chose to create an un-necessary situation, with my father and I trying desperately to see where they were going, and trying to make sure the two in the low wing planes didn't nail us. With respect to my "attitude problem", I suppose it's just a case where it seems some people take themselves Way Too Seriously. "White flight", ten second landing intervals, "break now!"; you guys should join the Boy Scouts so you can practice marching in step (turns can be very difficult). I've also heard it's fun to wear camoflauge to play paintball... (oops, there's that damn attitude thing again! sorry...) Roger Out!, Harry Did you ever think that they had you in sight and knew that two were able to enter downwind without causing a conflict and the third would fit in nicely behind you? In my experience those that fly formation are more capable than the pilot that can't deal with anything but the 45 degree entry to downwind and you know the rest. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Stadt wrote:
"Harry Shin" wrote in message ... "Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message news ![]() Are you jealous that others have practiced and enjoy flying formation? Is it "airplane envy"? Your second paragraph indicates an attitude problem. Orval, Hmmm. By your own analysis, these "others have practiced and enjoy flying formation" did a lousy job, so I'm certainly not jealous of them. As far as "airplane envy" and my so-called "attitude problem", I guess I should feel honored that these guys chose to create an un-necessary situation, with my father and I trying desperately to see where they were going, and trying to make sure the two in the low wing planes didn't nail us. With respect to my "attitude problem", I suppose it's just a case where it seems some people take themselves Way Too Seriously. "White flight", ten second landing intervals, "break now!"; you guys should join the Boy Scouts so you can practice marching in step (turns can be very difficult). I've also heard it's fun to wear camoflauge to play paintball... (oops, there's that damn attitude thing again! sorry...) Roger Out!, Harry Did you ever think that they had you in sight and knew that two were able to enter downwind without causing a conflict and the third would fit in nicely behind you? In my experience those that fly formation are more capable than the pilot that can't deal with anything but the 45 degree entry to downwind and you know the rest. Hi guys... Just a question - what is this 45 degree entry to downwind we keep hearing about? I'm from the other side of the world and that's not something I was taught - instead, like the guys from the UK, I do an overhead join at an uncontrolled field, descending on the non-traffic side, especially if unsure of the circuit direction. Here, most of our smaller airfields are totally deserted, so there's no-one to observe to determine circuit direction... Thanks! Chris New Zealand |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Just a question - what is this 45 degree entry to downwind we keep hearing about? I'm from the other side of the world and that's not something I was taught - instead, like the guys from the UK, I do an overhead join at an uncontrolled field, It is part of the recommended approach in the U.S., and is so commonly used that alternative entries are upsetting to many pilots. It really doesn't matter how you approach an airport, but it sure helps if everyone does it the same way. Since I fly a high-wing airplane, however, I would prefer that people not descend upon me while I'm in the pattern. As an alternative to the 45, I would choose a mid-field crossover to the downwind, but not if there's a NORDO aircraft in the pattern. He's expecting traffic to enter from his right, not his left. all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... It really doesn't matter how you approach an airport, but it sure helps if everyone does it the same way. How so? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... Just a question - what is this 45 degree entry to downwind we keep hearing about? I'm from the other side of the world and that's not something I was taught - instead, like the guys from the UK, I do an overhead join at an uncontrolled field, It is part of the recommended approach in the U.S., and is so commonly used that alternative entries are upsetting to many pilots. It really doesn't matter how you approach an airport, but it sure helps if everyone does it the same way. Since I fly a high-wing airplane, however, I would prefer that people not descend upon me while I'm in the pattern. As an alternative to the 45, I would choose a mid-field crossover to the downwind, but not if there's a NORDO aircraft in the pattern. He's expecting traffic to enter from his right, not his left. Doesn't matter if you fly with or without a radio you should expect traffic to enter the pattern anywhere and everywhere. Why do you think NORDO traffic would only expect traffic to enter from "his right, not his left?" all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:48:06 GMT, "Dave Stadt"
wrote: snip Since I fly a high-wing airplane, however, I would prefer that people not descend upon me while I'm in the pattern. As an alternative to the 45, I would choose a mid-field crossover to the downwind, but not if there's a NORDO aircraft in the pattern. He's expecting traffic to enter from his right, not his left. Doesn't matter if you fly with or without a radio you should expect traffic to enter the pattern anywhere and everywhere. Why do you think NORDO traffic would only expect traffic to enter from "his right, not his left?" Finally, someone who thinks like I do! If you only expect (and look for) the expected, the unexpected will get you sooner or later. There can be an aircraft in distress (emergency) that comes into the pattern from virtually anywhere. There can be a pilot who's lost who blunders into a traffic pattern / area. An analogy might be trusting other drivers in their cars when they use signals, merge onto freeways, etc. If you only expect them to do what they're supposed to do (or what would be deemed logical to do), you're asking for trouble.... Like defensive driving, defensive flying is the way to go. Bela P. Havasreti |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Finally, someone who thinks like I do! It would help if you guys would post what airport you are based at, so I can avoid them. all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cub Driver wrote in message . ..
Since I fly a high-wing airplane, however, I would prefer that people not descend upon me while I'm in the pattern. As an alternative to the 45, I would choose a mid-field crossover to the downwind, but not if there's a NORDO aircraft in the pattern. He's expecting traffic to enter from his right, not his left. He should be expecting traffic to enter any time from anywhere, just as you, and every competent pilot, are. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cub Driver wrote:
Just a question - what is this 45 degree entry to downwind we keep hearing about? I'm from the other side of the world and that's not something I was taught - instead, like the guys from the UK, I do an overhead join at an uncontrolled field, It is part of the recommended approach in the U.S., and is so commonly used that alternative entries are upsetting to many pilots. It really doesn't matter how you approach an airport, but it sure helps if everyone does it the same way. Since I fly a high-wing airplane, however, I would prefer that people not descend upon me while I'm in the pattern. As an alternative to the 45, I would choose a mid-field crossover to the downwind, but not if there's a NORDO aircraft in the pattern. He's expecting traffic to enter from his right, not his left. OK, just another dumb question.. When you talk about people descending on you in the circuit, I take it you mean they are descending while on downwind? That sounds extremely unwise!!! I'm surprised that what we do isn't also practised, or maybe it is but you call it something else... I also can't bring myself to call it a pattern - sorry, I'm so used to referring to it as a circuit, pattern sounds foreign to me :-) Here's how we do it.... When we do an overhead join, we start 500 feet above circuit altitude, and when ready, descend on the non-traffic side, i.e. the upwind side - the other side of the circuit from downwind, then when we're down to circuit altitude, we turn and fly the crosswind leg, then, while looking for traffic we turn downwind and fly the rest normally... I trust this doesn't come under the category of descending on you? No doubt this is normal, but called something else... See ya Chris |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Front louvers for Cherokee/Archer overhead vents? | Bob Chilcoat | Owning | 10 | February 3rd 04 10:19 PM |
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime | John | Piloting | 5 | November 20th 03 09:40 PM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |