![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's the email I sent to our CBS channel 5 in S.F. last night.
So far no response. Max T, MCFI Brian, Regarding the teaser for Wednesday's CBS Evening News: "There are thousands of general aviation airstrips around the country with little or no security. How can that be after 9-11? We'll have the story on Wednesday's CBS Evening News." You might want to consider on the local news going to a local airport and showing people how small these planes are, how little they carry, and hence how tiny a threat they are compared to airliners carrying thousands of gallons of gasoline. From the www.aopa.org website, AOPA President Phil Boyer testified before congress in 2001 that "in this national tragedy, it was airline security that was breached, and airline transport category equipment used as weapons. However, general aviation was the last allowed to return to the sky, and not all GA is yet flying. "We're not talking about big airplanes," Boyer told Congress. "We're talking about 4-place, single-engine aircraft that are on average 30 years old, cost the same as a car, and have the same weight and kinetic energy of a car." You only have to look at the pictures of the Cessna that the teenager flew into a building in Tampa to see that these planes are incapable of causing much damage. Most of these planes carry so little fuel they don't even burn when there's an accident. Give me a call if you want to talk further. I'll be in a meeting from 9-11AM, but should otherwise be free. best regards, xxxxx |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great points. Another would be the relatively small amount of fuel they
hold compared to the semi tractors running the roads these days. When loading potatoes on these trucks, the drivers routinely tell me to leave room so they can put on up to 300 gallons of diesel fuel. Much much more than your typical 172. -- Jim Burns III Remove "nospam" to reply "Max T, CFI" wrote in message news:t0hNb.66605$xy6.125011@attbi_s02... Here's the email I sent to our CBS channel 5 in S.F. last night. So far no response. Max T, MCFI Brian, Regarding the teaser for Wednesday's CBS Evening News: "There are thousands of general aviation airstrips around the country with little or no security. How can that be after 9-11? We'll have the story on Wednesday's CBS Evening News." You might want to consider on the local news going to a local airport and showing people how small these planes are, how little they carry, and hence how tiny a threat they are compared to airliners carrying thousands of gallons of gasoline. From the www.aopa.org website, AOPA President Phil Boyer testified before congress in 2001 that "in this national tragedy, it was airline security that was breached, and airline transport category equipment used as weapons. However, general aviation was the last allowed to return to the sky, and not all GA is yet flying. "We're not talking about big airplanes," Boyer told Congress. "We're talking about 4-place, single-engine aircraft that are on average 30 years old, cost the same as a car, and have the same weight and kinetic energy of a car." You only have to look at the pictures of the Cessna that the teenager flew into a building in Tampa to see that these planes are incapable of causing much damage. Most of these planes carry so little fuel they don't even burn when there's an accident. Give me a call if you want to talk further. I'll be in a meeting from 9-11AM, but should otherwise be free. best regards, xxxxx |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm not supporting CBS in anyway, and I do believe GA gets a lot of this kind of publicity, as is often stated on this forum, because we are a small "elite" minority. OTOH, I don't think the fear, rational or irrational, is based on the Tampa scenario. It is based on loading up a small twin, or a heavy single with explosives and following that with some suicide activity. I don't know anything about explosives, but I suspect that the 900+ useful load in a 182 could carry enough explosives to be pretty brutal in a crowded place. I know, I know - there are plenty of equivalent threats that are not monitored (I liked the post about trucks/OKC). I just don't like to take the stance that GA is no threat - what happens after some incident occurs? Does GA become shut down? On a macro scale the problem is trying to manage all terrorist risk at the expense of common sense and reality. On a less grand scale, I just would like to see GA as concerned and proactive, since I'm afraid of what the government will do if they are allowed, through an incident, to become reactive. This doesn't take away from the fact that the CBS trailer is ridiculous. Michael "Max T, CFI" wrote in message news:t0hNb.66605$xy6.125011@attbi_s02... Here's the email I sent to our CBS channel 5 in S.F. last night. So far no response. Max T, MCFI Brian, Regarding the teaser for Wednesday's CBS Evening News: "There are thousands of general aviation airstrips around the country with little or no security. How can that be after 9-11? We'll have the story on Wednesday's CBS Evening News." You might want to consider on the local news going to a local airport and showing people how small these planes are, how little they carry, and hence how tiny a threat they are compared to airliners carrying thousands of gallons of gasoline. From the www.aopa.org website, AOPA President Phil Boyer testified before congress in 2001 that "in this national tragedy, it was airline security that was breached, and airline transport category equipment used as weapons. However, general aviation was the last allowed to return to the sky, and not all GA is yet flying. "We're not talking about big airplanes," Boyer told Congress. "We're talking about 4-place, single-engine aircraft that are on average 30 years old, cost the same as a car, and have the same weight and kinetic energy of a car." You only have to look at the pictures of the Cessna that the teenager flew into a building in Tampa to see that these planes are incapable of causing much damage. Most of these planes carry so little fuel they don't even burn when there's an accident. Give me a call if you want to talk further. I'll be in a meeting from 9-11AM, but should otherwise be free. best regards, xxxxx |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael 182" wrote in message news:hChNb.66255$8H.106469@attbi_s03... I'm not supporting CBS in anyway, and I do believe GA gets a lot of this kind of publicity, as is often stated on this forum, because we are a small "elite" minority. OTOH, I don't think the fear, rational or irrational, is based on the Tampa scenario. It is based on loading up a small twin, or a heavy single with explosives and following that with some suicide activity. I don't know anything about explosives, but I suspect that the 900+ useful load in a 182 could carry enough explosives to be pretty brutal in a crowded place. You could carry a lot more explosives in a 3/4 ton pickup or a 12 foot U-Haul or fake UPS truck. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As I said in my original post "I know, I know - there are plenty of
equivalent threats that are not monitored (I liked the post about trucks/OKC). I just don't like to take the stance that GA is no threat - what happens after some incident occurs? Does GA become shut down?" "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Michael 182" wrote in message news:hChNb.66255$8H.106469@attbi_s03... I'm not supporting CBS in anyway, and I do believe GA gets a lot of this kind of publicity, as is often stated on this forum, because we are a small "elite" minority. OTOH, I don't think the fear, rational or irrational, is based on the Tampa scenario. It is based on loading up a small twin, or a heavy single with explosives and following that with some suicide activity. I don't know anything about explosives, but I suspect that the 900+ useful load in a 182 could carry enough explosives to be pretty brutal in a crowded place. You could carry a lot more explosives in a 3/4 ton pickup or a 12 foot U-Haul or fake UPS truck. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael 182" wrote in message news:M9jNb.66706$8H.107077@attbi_s03... As I said in my original post "I know, I know - there are plenty of equivalent threats that are not monitored (I liked the post about trucks/OKC). I just don't like to take the stance that GA is no threat - what happens after some incident occurs? Does GA become shut down?" You know that, I know that, and the rest of the people here know that -- these mental midgets don't (seem to) know it and the audience doesn't (apparently) seem able to figure that out. "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... You could carry a lot more explosives in a 3/4 ton pickup or a 12 foot U-Haul or fake UPS truck. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
So I invested my US$6°°.....GUESS WHAT!!!... less than ten days later, I received money | [email protected] | Owning | 1 | January 16th 05 06:48 AM |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
30 Jan 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 31st 04 03:55 AM |
Uh-oh: CBS News to air anti-GA hit piece on Wed. 1/14 | Maule Driver | Owning | 65 | January 17th 04 09:58 PM |