A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The President's Space Initiative Speech



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 15th 04, 03:07 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jay Honeck" wrote:
One of the most laughable parts of Bush's speech was when
he said that a human base on the moon would make space
exploration cheaper? Yep folks, according to the president,
a moon base is going to SAVE us some money.
Oooookaaay.


The science behind interplanetary space travel dictates that
a moon base WILL make space exploration cheaper.

The main cost of space exploration is in the booster system
required to escape Earth's gravity. Launching from the
moon's lesser gravitational pull is much easier, requires
smaller rockets, and is thus much cheaper.


Everything launched from the moon will have to be launched from Earth
first. Anything going to Mars will have to escape gravity twice.

We will have to fund two spaceports, one of which will have to be
resupplied by rocket ships. How is this going to be cheaper?
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM
(remove pants to reply by email)


  #2  
Old January 15th 04, 04:50 PM
S Narayan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...

"Jay Honeck" wrote:
One of the most laughable parts of Bush's speech was when
he said that a human base on the moon would make space
exploration cheaper? Yep folks, according to the president,
a moon base is going to SAVE us some money.
Oooookaaay.


The science behind interplanetary space travel dictates that
a moon base WILL make space exploration cheaper.

The main cost of space exploration is in the booster system
required to escape Earth's gravity. Launching from the
moon's lesser gravitational pull is much easier, requires
smaller rockets, and is thus much cheaper.


Everything launched from the moon will have to be launched from Earth
first. Anything going to Mars will have to escape gravity twice.

We will have to fund two spaceports, one of which will have to be
resupplied by rocket ships. How is this going to be cheaper?
--


The only way one can avoid this to have a moon colony which can produce
stuff for the 2nd launch instead of getting it from earth. That means
setting up a self-sustaining moon colony plus more. How long is that going
to take? The ISS is not done, and space shuttle program is in remission.
Wow, talk about pipe dreams. This will be a 50-100 year program. It's
probably a good long term goal, but the timing is a bit suspect.


  #3  
Old January 15th 04, 11:23 PM
plumb bob
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"S Narayan" wrote in message
...

The only way one can avoid this to have a moon colony which can produce
stuff for the 2nd launch instead of getting it from earth. That means
setting up a self-sustaining moon colony plus more. How long is that going
to take? The ISS is not done, and space shuttle program is in remission.
Wow, talk about pipe dreams. This will be a 50-100 year program. It's
probably a good long term goal, but the timing is a bit suspect.


Really? Think about what you are saying. It is quite absurd. What are they
going to do? Head down to the Moon Home Depot and pick up supplies or what?
Everything, except dirt, is going to have to come from earth. And last time
I checked, dirt is not on the materials list to build a space ship.

So tell us what can be manifactured on the moon at a cheaper cost than on
earth. Really, I'm clutching my chair in anticipation to hear how this will
be done.

Plumb Bob


  #4  
Old January 16th 04, 06:09 AM
Mutts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 23:23:13 GMT, "plumb bob"
wrote:


Really? Think about what you are saying. It is quite absurd. What are they
going to do? Head down to the Moon Home Depot and pick up supplies or what?
Everything, except dirt, is going to have to come from earth. And last time
I checked, dirt is not on the materials list to build a space ship.

So tell us what can be manifactured on the moon at a cheaper cost than on
earth. Really, I'm clutching my chair in anticipation to hear how this will
be done.

Plumb Bob


There are many raw resources on the moon. It wont make sense
at first to try to use them all. but eventually............


http://www.crystalinks.com/lunarmining.html

http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/s...ish_603711.htm

http://www.permanent.com/l-mining.htm

http://www.permanent.com/l-overvw.htm

http://www.upenn.edu/gazette/0397/0397gaz2.html
  #5  
Old January 16th 04, 05:45 PM
S Narayan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"plumb bob" wrote in message
news:BhFNb.75868$I06.331400@attbi_s01...

"S Narayan" wrote in message
...

The only way one can avoid this to have a moon colony which can produce
stuff for the 2nd launch instead of getting it from earth. That means
setting up a self-sustaining moon colony plus more. How long is that

going
to take? The ISS is not done, and space shuttle program is in remission.
Wow, talk about pipe dreams. This will be a 50-100 year program. It's
probably a good long term goal, but the timing is a bit suspect.


Really? Think about what you are saying. It is quite absurd. What are they
going to do? Head down to the Moon Home Depot and pick up supplies or

what?
Everything, except dirt, is going to have to come from earth. And last

time
I checked, dirt is not on the materials list to build a space ship.

So tell us what can be manifactured on the moon at a cheaper cost than on
earth. Really, I'm clutching my chair in anticipation to hear how this

will
be done.


We are on the same side. If you read my post carefully, I said this would
take the establishment of a moon colony which could take decades with
cooperation from many countries. Power generation, housing, plants, food,
mining etc..all need to be set up as in those science fiction movies. This
will involve massive "transfer" of resources from earth. Once that happens,
the next step can take place. I am not saying it is going to be cheap or
quick.


  #6  
Old January 15th 04, 05:07 PM
Todd Pattist
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dan Luke" wrote:

Everything launched from the moon will have to be launched from Earth
first. Anything going to Mars will have to escape gravity twice.


Perhaps, perhaps not. Materials for radiation shielding,
perhaps fuel or oxidizer are available on the moon.
Construction is likely to be easier than on-orbit, and a
Mars mission is likely to be heavier than a single boost can
accommodate.


Todd Pattist
(Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.)
___
Make a commitment to learn something from every flight.
Share what you learn.
  #7  
Old January 15th 04, 11:11 PM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Dan Luke"
wrote:

Everything launched from the moon will have to be launched from Earth
first. Anything going to Mars will have to escape gravity twice.


Not true.

--
Bob Noel
  #8  
Old January 15th 04, 11:59 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Noel" wrote:
Everything launched from the moon will have to be launched from

Earth
first. Anything going to Mars will have to escape gravity twice.


Not true.


True unless you posit a moon base that mines raw materials, refines
them, and manufactures Mars shot equipment from scratch - an absurd idea
in the time frame of Bush's plan.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM
(remove pants to reply by email)


  #9  
Old January 16th 04, 03:53 AM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...

"Bob Noel" wrote:
Everything launched from the moon will have to be launched from

Earth
first. Anything going to Mars will have to escape gravity twice.


Not true.


True unless you posit a moon base that mines raw materials, refines
them, and manufactures Mars shot equipment from scratch - an absurd idea
in the time frame of Bush's plan.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM
(remove pants to reply by email)



Bush has it all figured out. He is going to trade the Martians green cheese
for fuel.





  #10  
Old January 16th 04, 04:18 AM
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
...
Bush has it all figured out. He is going to trade the Martians green

cheese
for fuel.


No way. If he thinks the Martians have fuel, he'll announce evidence of WMD
as a pretext to invade them.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Space Elevator Big John Home Built 111 July 21st 04 04:31 PM
Hubble plug to be pulled John Carrier Military Aviation 33 March 19th 04 04:19 AM
Rules on what can be in a hangar Brett Justus Owning 13 February 27th 04 05:35 PM
OT (sorta): Bush Will Announce New Space Missions Dav1936531 Military Aviation 0 January 9th 04 10:34 AM
Strategic Command Missions Rely on Space Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 30th 03 09:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.