A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The President's Space Initiative Speech



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 15th 04, 03:11 PM
Todd Pattist
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"plumb bob" wrote:

How can we fall behind the Chinese because they are going to the moon? We
already did that almost 35 years ago!


In ten years, if the Chinese can send a man to the moon, and
we still can't, the average observer will say we're behind.

Todd Pattist
(Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.)
___
Make a commitment to learn something from every flight.
Share what you learn.
  #2  
Old January 15th 04, 03:16 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Todd Pattist" wrote:
In ten years, if the Chinese can send a man to the moon, and
we still can't, the average observer will say we're behind.


Which is exactly why we went in the first place, and why the Chinese are
talking about going now: for the propaganda value.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM
(remove pants to reply by email)


  #3  
Old January 15th 04, 05:11 PM
Todd Pattist
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dan Luke" wrote:

Which is exactly why we went in the first place, and why the Chinese are
talking about going now: for the propaganda value.


I won't argue. Value is value. I'd like America to be
thought of and ultimately remembered as the strongest
supporter of humanity's space program, not just the only
nation to ever use a nuclear weapon in war.

Todd Pattist
(Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.)
___
Make a commitment to learn something from every flight.
Share what you learn.
  #4  
Old January 18th 04, 09:43 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Todd Pattist wrote in message . ..
"Dan Luke" wrote:

Which is exactly why we went in the first place, and why the Chinese are
talking about going now: for the propaganda value.


I won't argue. Value is value. I'd like America to be
thought of and ultimately remembered as the strongest
supporter of humanity's space program, not just the only
nation to ever use a nuclear weapon in war.


From what is in the PNAC, I rather think this moon base
is a missile base. Talk about Heinlein...
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Space Elevator Big John Home Built 111 July 21st 04 04:31 PM
Hubble plug to be pulled John Carrier Military Aviation 33 March 19th 04 04:19 AM
Rules on what can be in a hangar Brett Justus Owning 13 February 27th 04 05:35 PM
OT (sorta): Bush Will Announce New Space Missions Dav1936531 Military Aviation 0 January 9th 04 10:34 AM
Strategic Command Missions Rely on Space Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 30th 03 09:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.