![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeb" wrote in message Well the 45 degree entry to the pattern is in the AC61-23 (Page 6-9) as as this and the AIM form the requirements for the PTS I cannot believe that this form of pattern entry is the result of " a small-but-vocal cadre of pilots ? and even some FAA inspectors ? who consider any other type of pattern entry (straight-in, crosswind, etc.) to be a felony." It seems to be the policy of the FAA with the result that if there was an incident between a pilot flying the pattern as per AC61-23 and a pilot doing doing what only can be considered an unorthodox pattern entry, then I can bet which pilot will get the benefit of the doubt. Your support for this is.................. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Front louvers for Cherokee/Archer overhead vents? | Bob Chilcoat | Owning | 10 | February 3rd 04 10:19 PM |
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime | John | Piloting | 5 | November 20th 03 09:40 PM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |