![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C J Campbell wrote:
.... Then in that case I have to disagree with him on that point. It might be interesting to get a couple of FSDO interpretations. The article includes the statement: "... In fact, in Canada, the crosswind entry is the preferred method, and I'm not even sure the 45 entry is even mentioned!..." The Canadian link is http://www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/an...new197.htm#MF2 which suggests that the 45-degree entry is frowned upon when there is no traffic advisory available. Since the US and Canadian systems are so similar, I would have to believe there is some good reason for this. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Front louvers for Cherokee/Archer overhead vents? | Bob Chilcoat | Owning | 10 | February 3rd 04 10:19 PM |
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime | John | Piloting | 5 | November 20th 03 09:40 PM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |