Clearwater FL mid air; one fatality

Enefesdi Varspooli Bhootpalamdi wrote:
you, sir, are an idiot, in addition to a troll.

Yep, that could be.



and a quite unattractive troll at that.

No, actually I'm pretty good looking.



the AIM states that you call every position in the pattern, be it in
crosswind, downwind, base or final. the aim is advisory, you say, and
not regulatory! oh ho, but explain that to an NTSB judge when you've
knocked another plane out of the sky and ended several people's lives
prematurely because you thought the advisory information was
unnecessary, and didn't contribute enough to safety to justify lifting
your green, sausagelike finger and depressing the extremely life limited
PTT switch, energizing the grossly inefficient, hence gasoline wasting
radio, which jeopardizes the lives of thousands of birds in your
vicinity simply through its frankensteinesque, extravagant use of
radiant energy.

Now, that's funny.



in fact, you probably have to start your APU just to transmit.

Hmmmmm...APU. Might have to get one of those.



in all seriousness, i certainly hope you don't come into contact with
student pilots or pilots that are still malleable in their attention to
detail or attitude towards doing every last useful thing to further
safety of flight for everyone; not just themselves.

As a matter of fact I do, as a rep of the FAA no less. Every pilot
meeting we have with the college I speak of I reccomend that they talk
less and look more, just from a personal preference standpoint.



you need only consider the situation where instrument traffic gets a
late handoff to an uncontrolled CTAF,

And then what good is the 48 radio calls you just made if there's no one
there?


and someone not making any calls
going onto base or final, and you have yourselves an error chain fit for
a midair.

Are you looking outside? Ever?


when both planes are low, slow, and focused on the runway.
need me to draw a picture?

Sounds like about all you would understand.



note: read the AIM on proper radio speaking technique, not just when to
speak. you'll probably cut down your transmission lengths by half.

Have you ever read this newsgroup? Ever?


AND ANOTHER THING. stop asking for any traffic in the area to please
advise when you change to CTAF;

Oh I see now, you think I drive a jet.


change 10nm out, that way you can listen
for anyone in the pattern making PROPER calls on EVERY leg.

Radio calls are not necessary, on any leg.


of course,
if there was only one person in the pattern there, and they were making
one call on every downwind, and doing full-stop taxibacks, you probably
want to listen up 20nm up if you're not flying a piper cub.

I fly a 182. At 10 miles out one call every midfield downwind would
allow me to hear 3 or 4 calls. That's plenty enough for me. How about you?

you, sir, are an idiot, in addition to a troll.
Yep, that could be.

but you are not as good as that guy a few weeks ago. ;-)
He gave it to me and a few others quite good. He shut
up as quickly as he arrived. He was an ass but I gotta
give him credit for dishing it out with style. grin

ok, now seriously.

As a matter of fact I do, as a rep of the FAA no less. Every pilot
meeting we have with the college I speak of I reccomend that they talk
less and look more, just from a personal preference standpoint.

I'm a low time pilot but I have to say it is somewhere in between
both of you. We're talking about uncontrolled airports. personally
they scare the hell out of me because while everyone is giving
position reports and can't get a word in and thinking about
what to say and when to say and just trying to fly the damn
airplane, there are those planes that do NOT even have radios
forget the pilots that have them and don't know how to use them.


Everyone has their comfort level. If an uncontrolled airport
is that busy, I'm outta there. I don't like it one bit. 3
people in the pattern is no big deal. 4 starts getting tight
since that 5th person might be on approach. 5 forget it. bye
bye. That is my comfort level. If you are at airports with
all trainers, it gets even more hairy since the students
workload is quite high already, they aren't flying very
tight patterns, they are 100 feet too high, 200 feet too high,
all over horizontally, make your reports. If there isn't
room to make one, land and get out or fly away to another
airport.



going onto base or final, and you have yourselves an error chain fit
for a midair.
Are you looking outside? Ever?

correct, for the plane that doesn't have radios. Hopefully
the other pilots behind you are watching as well.

Also as they say, there is a reason why you have two ears (and
two eyes) and one mouth.

I fly a 182. At 10 miles out one call every midfield downwind would
allow me to hear 3 or 4 calls. That's plenty enough for me. How about
you?

I'd recommend more than that. At least say you are on approach for the
pattern to give heads up for people and then announc you are on downwind
so people know you are there. From there, announce if there is space
on the frequency.


Now for my story, on my PPL checkride we did the emergency engine out in
2 parts. First, the initial part including checklist and setting up for
a landing. We descended from 4500 down to about 3000 feet by the time
we decided I did everything, now time to land the plane. The 2nd
part was to do a short approach which was at an uncontrolled airport.
Well I turned too early and was high on base. I lined up for final
and started my slip. Well as I am about 1/2 mile out a Cessna who
was in the pattern, landed, taxied back, decides to take the runway
without making a radio call. he didn't call and probably didn't look
as I was in a slip and probably very visable. Well I had to
go to the side of the runway, slipped some more was just about to add
power and go around when the DE said, ok land it long and we'll call
it ok. I did that. Nevertheless it got a touch hairy with idiot who
did not use his radio when he should have and didn't use his eyes either.

Gerald

"Gerald Sylvester" wrote in message
link.net...

Everyone has their comfort level. If an uncontrolled airport
is that busy, I'm outta there. I don't like it one bit. 3
people in the pattern is no big deal. 4 starts getting tight
since that 5th person might be on approach. 5 forget it. bye
bye. That is my comfort level. If you are at airports with
all trainers, it gets even more hairy since the students
workload is quite high already, they aren't flying very
tight patterns, they are 100 feet too high, 200 feet too high,
all over horizontally, make your reports. If there isn't
room to make one, land and get out or fly away to another
airport.

Well, I'll never forget the call I got from PCT last year,

"cancellation of IFR received, radar services terminated, keep assigned
beacon code until on the ground, 15 plus targets in the vicinity of the
airport, switch to advisory approved, good luck!"

We flew away from the airport, set up the 45 entry and joined the
conflagration, which got interesting when someone made an overhead entry
above the pattern to make the descending right turn to join the 45. I made
as many position reports as possible, but not every one, and I'm not saying
it was ideal, but it all worked.

"Gerald Sylvester" wrote in message
link.net...
Also as they say, there is a reason why you have two ears (and
two eyes) and one mouth.

For flying?

Paul

Paul Sengupta wrote:
"Gerald Sylvester" wrote in message
link.net...

Also as they say, there is a reason why you have two ears (and
two eyes) and one mouth.
For flying?

yes but only for flying.



gerald

Newps wrote:



Enefesdi Varspooli Bhootpalamdi wrote:

in all seriousness, i certainly hope you don't come into contact with
student pilots or pilots that are still malleable in their attention
to detail or attitude towards doing every last useful thing to further
safety of flight for everyone; not just themselves.

As a matter of fact I do, as a rep of the FAA no less. Every pilot
meeting we have with the college I speak of I reccomend that they talk
less and look more, just from a personal preference standpoint.

so, as a representative of the FAA, you're foisting your personal
preferences on students and college CFIs instead of the recommended
procedure in the AIM? how interesting. you wouldn't want to back up
your claim of being an FAA employee with a certificate number? and i
don't think cleaning the toilets at your FSDO counts as being a
representative.

you need only consider the situation where instrument traffic gets a
late handoff to an uncontrolled CTAF,

And then what good is the 48 radio calls you just made if there's no one
there?

what good are the course corrections in the clouds if there's no
mountains there? or other planes? because you're going to get yelled
at, and you might even hit something. the more you do it, the better
the odds of both.

going onto base or final, and you have yourselves an error chain fit
for a midair.

Are you looking outside? Ever?

oh, i'm sorry. you must not have heard. we have these things called
headsets now. they actually have the microphones *attached* to the
headset, so you don't have to bend down and pick it up, and talk into it
while contemplating your navel any more. try http://www.sportys.com

do you have to look down to find the PTT switch every time? or is there
some sort of physical limitation you possess that somehow closes your
eyes when you open your mouth? you must have alot of bruises from
running into things constantly.


when both planes are low, slow, and focused on the runway.

need me to draw a picture?

Sounds like about all you would understand.

yeah. pretty much. at least i know how to draw one. see extended.


note: read the AIM on proper radio speaking technique, not just when
to speak. you'll probably cut down your transmission lengths by half.

Have you ever read this newsgroup? Ever?

have you ever read the AIM? ever?

AND ANOTHER THING. stop asking for any traffic in the area to please
advise when you change to CTAF;

Oh I see now, you think I drive a jet.

no, but it certainly sounds like you drive a plane.

change 10nm out, that way you can listen

for anyone in the pattern making PROPER calls on EVERY leg.


Radio calls are not necessary, on any leg.

nor is using a landing light if the aircraft is not for hire at night,
but we turn those on during the day for visibility don't we? why don't
you use the radio? just sounds like you're scared to use it. either
that or you have a thpeech impediment, and have a complexsh about it.

if there was only one person in the pattern there, and they were
making one call on every downwind, and doing full-stop taxibacks, you
probably want to listen up 20nm up if you're not flying a piper cub.


I fly a 182. At 10 miles out one call every midfield downwind would
allow me to hear 3 or 4 calls. That's plenty enough for me. How about
you?

i've flown everything from a citabria to a PC12. and being an FAA
employee *snort*, you'll realize that you don't get handoffs based on
groundspeed. you get them based on distance and in some cases, altitude.

the simple facts related to this are laid out thusly:

one call per circuit results in approximately 6-10 calls per hour, given
a suitable landing runway and a pattern that's not overly congested.
let's pick the average of 8 circuits per hour. that means, in a given
hour, you make eight radio calls. are you saying that it takes you
22-30 minutes to make it to an airport from 10nm in your 182? 3-4
reports, right? BS. even in a 182, you can easily see 130 KIAS,
especially on a properly planned descent. let's say you've got 7nm to
go from the handoff to the 45 entry. do you know how long it takes to
go 7nm at 130kt GS? three minutes and twelve seconds.

that 3-4 reports isn't starting to look so hot, is it. survey says?
BZZZRT. sorry.

so apparently it is 100% possible, and might even be more probable to
happen than not, that you'll enter the pattern with one other person in
it, and not hear a single radio call from them, because they only call
midfield downwind. which is *exactly* where you will be entering the
downwind from the 45, because you only follow certain parts of the AIM
you agree with, but not the others that just don't make sense to someone
like you.

the *maximum* groundspeed to go 7nm in the eight minutes required or
more, is 52.5kt. that's *required* if you're going to hear that once
every seven-eight minute call before you enter the pattern. even given
10 takeoff/landings per hour, hence 10 calls per hour, the maximum
airspeed to guarantee hearing that *ONE* radio call before you enter the
pattern is 70kt. for all 7nm to the 45. yeah, right.

now you're starting to sound like quite an ass. apparently you did need
me to draw a picture for you, after all.

notice i didn't even bring up getting a handoff at 210KIAS at 4000' MSL
on a 20C day. OR maybe i will: it takes 1.8 minutes to make it from
handoff to 45, assuming a constant speed. we can add .5 for a slowdown
to gear speed, 2.3 minutes sounds okay. suddenly that call per leg
model starts to sound alot more attractive, especially considering the
closure rates of higher performance aircraft.

don't even bother replying if you're just going to blather on about how
i'm wrong and you're right; i expect a cogent, comprehensible argument
as to how these numbers, and this simple, simple math doesn't actually
mean what it does.

%nfsd

"Enefesdi Varspooli Bhootpalamdi" wrote in message
news:lYLOb.38240$Ar1.6538@fed1read04...
Newps wrote:


And then what good is the 48 radio calls you just made if there's no one
there?


The inbound IFR over the IAF can hear you, if desired. Inbound to airport,
I monitor the CTAF from 25 miles out, if possible. This may very well be
the reason for the "any traffic advise please" line, because someone thinks
they are all alone.

Before I get beat up for that, I was reading the NTSB investigation on the
Quincy, MA accident involving a 1900C and a biz jet. The use of the
despised phrase appears to be recommended as described in the report.

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 07:33:55 -0500, "Robert Henry"
wrote:

This may very well be
the reason for the "any traffic advise please" line, because someone thinks
they are all alone.

So if the pilot uttering that request (despite it not being
recommended by the Advisory Circular) receives no reply, is he to
erroneously believe that he is alone in the pattern? What of the
NORDO aircraft that is incapable of radio communication, or the pilot
who chooses not to respond to such a nonstandard radio broadcast?

Just make the self announced position report broadcasts as the AC
suggests:

The FAA Advisory Circular web site
http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/CurACFARFrame?OpenFrameSet
provides AC 90-42, here
http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/ACNumber/C54E50252A7FA56D862569D8007804BA?OpenDocument

AC 90-42 defines CTAF "Self-announce" usage as limited to:

"Self-announce" is a procedure whereby pilots broadcast
their position, intended flight activity or ground operation on
the designated CTAF.


Back in February 2002 Roger Long started a message thread on this
topic that accreted 235 articles:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=b19q7u4dae0hon8cgmgqk7gp9jb10cob1a%40new s-server.socal.rr.com&rnum=4&prev=/groups%3Fas_q%3DAdvisory%2520Circular%26safe%3Dima ges%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26as_ugroup%3Drec.aviation.piloting%26as_uauthor s%3Dlarry%2520Dighera%26lr%3D%26hl%3Den

wrote in message
news

So if the pilot uttering that request (despite it not being
recommended by the Advisory Circular) receives no reply, is he to
erroneously believe that he is alone in the pattern?

I was very clear on that point.

What of the
NORDO aircraft that is incapable of radio communication, or the pilot
who chooses not to respond to such a nonstandard radio broadcast?

The former will not respond, though may have the ability to receive such
transmissions; the latter need only provide the calls specified in the AIM
to satisfy the request.

I agree that the 10 mile announcement serves attention to the lonely pattern
flyer that now would be a good time to start talking, so the extra
"...please advise" words are unnecessary.


Just make the self announced position report broadcasts as the AC
suggests:

or as set forth in the AIM, which "contains _the fundamentals required in
order to fly in the United States NAS_.

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 19:39:35 -0500, "Robert Henry"
wrote:


wrote in message
news

Just make the self announced position report broadcasts as the AC
suggests:

or as set forth in the AIM, which "contains _the fundamentals required in
order to fly in the United States NAS_.

You'll find that the AIM is a non-regulatory distillation of FAA
Orders, Regulations, and Advisory Circulars paraphrased for pilots.
The AIM is a handy resource that contains much information gathered
from many documents into a single volume. Personally, I prefer to dig
a little deeper at times, and research the original documents for a
more in-depth understanding of an issue.