A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Another black eye for GA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 19th 04, 05:58 PM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Neil Gould" wrote in message
ink.net...
Recently, Bruce Bockius posted:

"Neil Gould" wrote in message
Had that gone far enough that the operating pressure
caused the lid to fracture, a good portion of Northern Ohio would
have been in deep trouble.


That statement is as accurate as CBS's assesment of the dangers posed
by general aviation. I am continually amazed by people that get upset
when people who don't know anything about general aviation
irrationally express fear of it, but then turn around and do the exact
same about something they don't know about.

I am not a nuclear scientist, nor do I play one on TV. But, my background
in engineering does make this scenario one worthy of attention.


Sorry...that's not true. You're confusing a engineer with a scientist (and
one versed in nuclear physics at that).


So. Given
that the threats posed by GA are near to nil, and as I live in Northern
Ohio (and downwind from this plant), I'd be greatly relieved to know how
the release of radioactive steam and the resultant inability to cool the
reactor is not a problem. Both of these consequences have been stated by
the investigators.


Hearsay doesn't not enhance your "position as an engineer".

So, if you, in fact, know differently, enlighten me,
please.


That's what we're trying to find out, but your claim of credibility as a
engineer is rather misstated.


  #2  
Old January 20th 04, 12:46 AM
Neil Gould
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi,

Recently, Tom Sixkiller posted:

"Neil Gould" wrote in message
Recently, Bruce Bockius posted:

"Neil Gould" wrote in message
Had that gone far enough that the operating pressure
caused the lid to fracture, a good portion of Northern Ohio would
have been in deep trouble.

That statement is as accurate as CBS's assesment of the dangers
posed by general aviation. I am continually amazed by people that
get upset when people who don't know anything about general aviation
irrationally express fear of it, but then turn around and do the
exact same about something they don't know about.

I am not a nuclear scientist, nor do I play one on TV. But, my
background in engineering does make this scenario one worthy of
attention.


Sorry...that's not true. You're confusing a engineer with a scientist
(and one versed in nuclear physics at that).

Where is the confusion? The problem with the reactor lid was a
*mechanical* one, within the realm of strength of materials and structural
integrity. Guess what? That's what engineers study. So, if you are under
the impression that this was *not* a scenario worthy of attention, then
offer some insights as to why, and why the proposed fixes were rejected,
keeping this plant closed for a couple of years?

So. Given
that the threats posed by GA are near to nil, and as I live in
Northern Ohio (and downwind from this plant), I'd be greatly
relieved to know how the release of radioactive steam and the
resultant inability to cool the reactor is not a problem. Both of
these consequences have been stated by the investigators.


Hearsay doesn't not enhance your "position as an engineer".

So, if you, in fact, know differently, enlighten me,
please.


That's what we're trying to find out, but your claim of credibility
as a engineer is rather misstated.

To begin with, I'm not claiming credibility on the basis of my background
in engineering. I think it helps me to understand the nature of the
problem. Beyond that, people can draw their own conclusions.

What puzzles me about your response is that you're turning it into some
kind of personal matter, rather than dealing with the facts. DON'T take my
word for it. But, for some reason, you don't even go so far as to Google
on "Davis-Besse" to find out for yourself what the circumstances are. It's
not a new situation, and much has been written about it. So, to put an end
to this, here's the first of many pages that turn up with that simple
phrase:

cleveland.com: Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station
.... Is it safe? Is the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station safe? The Plain
Dealer investigates...
» Latest: Davis-Besse workers slip up during restart preparations. ...
http://www.cleveland.com/davisbesse/ - 36k - similar pages
toledoblade.com
.... JANUARY 16, 2004 Managers changed at Davis-Besse Akron-based
FirstEnergy, which is
still trying to obtain approval to restart its troubled Davis-Besse
nuclear ...
http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs...ategory=NEWS30 - 60k -
Jan 17, 2004 - similar pages
Davis-Besse: The Reactor with a Hole in its Head
.... fact sheet Davis-Besse: The Reactor with a Hole in its Head The
reactor
core at the Davis-Besse nuclear plant sits within a metal ...
http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/n...cfm?pageID=790 -
40k - similar pages
Davis-Besse Retrospective
.... analysis Davis-Besse Retrospective, ... The FirstEnergy Nuclear
Operating Company,
the owner of Davis-Besse, was prepared to contest an order. ...
http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/n...fm?pageID=1133 -
31k - similar pages [ More results from www.ucsusa.org ]
US Nuclear Reactors - Davis-Besse
Davis-Besse Ohio ... PWR= Pressurized Light Water Reactor Description: The
Davis-Besse
power plant is located in Oak Harbor, Ohio, on a site covering 954 acres.
....
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear...avisbesse.html -
15k - similar pages
Davis-Besse nuclear power plant -- Ohio Citizen Action
FirstEnergy and Davis-Besse. Jan 17: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
investigating
overtime at Davis-Besse ... OAK HARBOR -- Davis-Besse plant suffers new
setback. ...
http://www.ohiocitizen.org/campaigns.../nucfront.html - 26k - Jan
17, 2004 - similar pages
Davis-Besse
.... Davis-Besse Oak Harbor, Ohio, United States Pressurized Water Reactor
(PWR) Net Output: 877 MWe Operable. Initial criticality: 08/1977. ...
http://www.nukeworker.com/nuke_facil...se/index.shtml -
25k - similar pages
Beacon Journal | 12/13/2003 | NRC may observe Davis-Besse test
.... Business. Posted on Sat, Dec. 13, 2003, NRC may observe Davis-Besse
test. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission could begin a three-day ...
http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjourna...ss/7482782.htm - 40k - similar
pages
Scoop: Anger Against Re-Start of Davis-Besse Reactor
.... DESTRUCTION SOON RE-OPEN? Public Anger Mounting Against Re-Start of
Davis-Besse Reactor By Harvey Wasserman http://www.freepress.org. ...
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0307/S00060.htm - 27k - Jan 17,
2004 - similar pages
Ottawa County Emergency Management
.... Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station produces electricity much like a
coal power plant. ... Davis-Besse is a pressurized water reactor. ...
http://www.ottawacountyema.org/davisbesse.html - 16k - similar pages


When you've consumed this material, I'd be happy to hear how you think
this is less of a problem than any threat posed by GA, which is what my
point was to begin with. Or, you can keep your head in the sand. Your
choice.

Neil


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: N.A.S.A. Astronauts "Autographed" 8x10 Photos J.R. Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 1 December 14th 04 04:37 PM
Black is black ! Dummy Owning 0 September 1st 04 05:19 PM
Black is black Dummy General Aviation 0 September 1st 04 05:19 PM
FS: N.A.S.A. Astronauts "Autographed" 8x10 Photos J.R. Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 0 January 5th 04 05:44 AM
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII Mike Yared Military Aviation 4 October 30th 03 03:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.